Matt Bors for November 14, 2011

  1. Cat7
    rockngolfer  over 12 years ago

    I have not figured out why the reslugs think it is OK for Cain to sexually harass women, when they impeached Bill Clinton for having sex with a WILLING partner.Hypocrisy.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Technojunkie  over 12 years ago

    Every time a black man poses a serious threat to the Democrats it’s “discovered” that he’s been harassing women. I’m sure it has nothing to do with how badly the Democrats would be screwed if they lost their iron grip on the black vote.

    I’m still voting for Newt though.

     •  Reply
  3. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 12 years ago

    Why do all the “don’t blame my Shrub for anything” folks fixate on Clinton, who isn’t running? Herman’s concept of U.S. foreign policy would be selling pizza in Hawaii, for $9.99. That’s a part of the real problem with him.

     •  Reply
  4. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 12 years ago

    None, actually, DrCanuck. The impeachment of Clinton was a remarkably shameless piece of political warfare. It started as an investigation of Whitewater — which, had it had any merit, MIGHT have been worth investigating. But in fact, there was nothing there. So Ken Starr went fishing, which was sleazy political opportunism at best.What two consenting adults do is absolutely none of our business, and especially not that of Congress, though the right-wingers seem to disagree — even those who are technically libertarian-leaning seem to have an exemption for sex. Clinton denied that he had sex with his intern, which set him up to be “indicted” for a “crime.”The language of the Constitution, for the record, is: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”—U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 4Whether or not I think Clinton’s behavior is sleazy (and I do), it certainly is not a “high crime.”This was the GOP’s method to cripple Clinton’s effectiveness in office. It worked rather well. They spent about $80 million of taxpayer monies on a meretricious action that gridlocked the government. Sound familiar?

     •  Reply
  5. It  s a gas station    by todd sullest
    Max Starman Jones  over 12 years ago

    The only thing Cain is guilty of is being a conservative, thinking Black man that left the liberal plantation run by rich white men. They don’t like losing slaves.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Tue Elung-Jensen  over 12 years ago

    The time stream cant be saved unless him becoming president was an alteration to begin with.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    dahawk  over 12 years ago

    Slip, I think the libs don’t want Cain as an opponents to Obama because that puts a halt to them being able to use the race card. I like Cain, but Newt is really looking better to me based on his vast experience and intelligence. My gosh, the guy has written 22 books, made 15,000 speeches, and voted many thousands of times in congress. The libs certainly don’t want him to be debating Obama on national television! He doesn’t need a teleprompter to help him speak either.

     •  Reply
  8. Calvin hobbes
    Noveltman  over 12 years ago

    No liberal press exists. There is an abundance of Corporate Media. You know, the ones that seek profit to the detriment of all else. Kinda sounds Republican, don’t it?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Matt Bors