New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis for January 13, 2011

  1. Gocomicsavatar
    aardvarkseyes  about 13 years ago

    Actually, the person who suggested removing the word from Huckleberry Finn did so in the hopes that more children would read the book. As it stands, many school boards, at the behest of parents, refuse to allow the book to be taught in high schools; this seemed like a compromise that would get the book into more schools and, therefore, give it more readers. You don’t have to agree with his methods, but it would be nice to see some appreciation for his goal.

     •  Reply
  2. Josette   13 march 2016   c
    Bill Thompson  about 13 years ago

    The same people who protest the book’s use of the N-word will no doubt protest the absence of the word. It isn’t the word they find objectionable, it’s Huck’s ability to think for himself and his courage to do what is right. Those are two qualities the banners fear to see in anyone.

    This is one of those times when I realize how much I value Pab’s work.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Samskara  about 13 years ago

    I’d like to second Ira Nayman’s comment.

     •  Reply
  4. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  about 13 years ago

    BillThompson, that was my point exactly yesterday. The real reason Huck Finn has been challenged over the years is because he ultimately sees past society’s “norms,” – or sees them for what they are and challenges our assumptions about who is a real person.

    That’s still a challenging theme, and those who condemn the work have chosen this one word as their reason for condemning it. As I said yesterday, I think this version is calling their bluff.

    I don’t actually believe it was created just for the money - this professor is NOT going to get rich from the book. Still, such an approach would be in keeping with Twain’s general approach to life. He loved the money and freely admitted it.

     •  Reply
  5. Color maria yoshiwara 226x300
    librisleo  about 13 years ago

    Dead to rights, Mr. Clemens!

    BTW, Ira and Samskara, the entire bible is a compromise. The books included were picked and chosen, by a select few who fought amongst themselves for their favorites, and the entire work has been proven to have been edited right, left and center for centuries.

    Compromise just means that no one ends up happy with the choice made.

     •  Reply
  6. Josette   13 march 2016   c
    Bill Thompson  about 13 years ago

    cdward, I hope you’re right about this edition of HF being a challenge to the book-banners. Publishers don’t usually print a book that they expect to fail, but someone might have decided that the publicity would repay the costs.

     •  Reply
  7. Twitter avatar
    Pab Sungenis creator about 13 years ago

    The comments in panel 3 are an edited (for length only) version of one of Twain’s own remarks.

     •  Reply
  8. Andy
    Sandfan  about 13 years ago

    ^And those comments point out the idiocy of religious fanaticism.

     •  Reply
  9. Keithmoon
    Wildcard24365  about 13 years ago

    I was going to ask where to find the unedited version of that quote, but Google came through, again.

     •  Reply
  10. V  9
    freeholder1  about 13 years ago

    So we substitute Jehovah or one of his other 127 names. And Christ said if it didn’t offend, it wasn’t working, much the same as Twain would say of his N_.

    By the way, believers would also say you’d have to excise Jesus and Holy Spirit as they’re the same thing as God.

    the trouble is that you are taking out a real name (German derivation) as opposed to a racial slur. If the critics were demanding you remove Huck from the book, then you’d have a fair comparison. As it is, it falls short.

    Bib, that would be the theologically liberal point of view, there are several million believers who are very happy with the choices made so your point falls well short also. And the usual slur is that it has no compromise in it, so thanks for expressing the other point of view there.

     •  Reply
  11. V  9
    freeholder1  about 13 years ago

    If folks had given it so much publicity during his life, Twain may well have made the fortune he needed to keep his personal publishing business alive and not have been so bitter when he wrote the books atheists now laud. Certainly his earlier work was more Christian in nature. I guess, like the aging Carlin, he lost his way.

     •  Reply
  12. Twitter avatar
    Pab Sungenis creator about 13 years ago

    The full, unedited, unexpurgated version of Twain’s quote, lest anyone accuse me of the same stuff that publisher is doing:

    “We despise all reverences and all the objects of reverence which are outside the pale of our own list of sacred things. And yet, with strange inconsistency, we are shocked when other people despise and defile the things which are holy to us.”

    The quote is from “Following The Equator.”

    I was already pushing it with the smaller font size in the past two days’ strips; if I’d shrunk everything enough to fit the whole quote it would be completely unreadable.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    jadoo823  about 13 years ago

    …I hate to pick nits, gweedo, but the great war was World War I - the Holocaust occurred in WWII…

     •  Reply
  14. Album cover
    kfaatz925  about 13 years ago

    Well said, Sam and Pab!

     •  Reply
  15. Computerhead
    Spyderred  about 13 years ago

    Kudos to all of the thinking people who see through the label (book banning) to the real issues underneath.

     •  Reply
  16. V  9
    freeholder1  about 13 years ago

    As eldo has slyly implied: Isn’t it funny how those who worry so much about censorship jump on the banned wagon when the philosophy or religion doesn’t suit them? I believe the hypo- label would fit anyone incensed at the N ban and now saying what a good idea Mark’s is.

     •  Reply
  17. Diff
    oscarfan  about 13 years ago

    Sam’s point in the last panel may be true, but let’s not lose sight of which of the two words in question actually appears in the strip and which one has been blacked out. Sort of undermines the point.

     •  Reply
  18. Twitter avatar
    Pab Sungenis creator about 13 years ago

    Oscar: I made the decision to black out because I didn’t want this week lost down the Fuzzy Bunny hole. I wanted to get my message across.

    Plus it made for a great side-swipe joke on Monday.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    prrdh  about 13 years ago

    Furienna, every translation is an edited version of the original.

    And even if we read the Bible in the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek, and could understand the words and expressions in the sense that the writers understood them, and it turned out to be translated accurately, the ‘repeats and inconsistencies’ and odd behavior you refer to are troubling only to moderns. Back then, people repeated things a lot to help their memories (most early Christians probably didn’t read the Bible; they had it read to them); they didn’t confuse truth with factuality the way so many do now; and madness wasn’t always thought of as a bad thing.

     •  Reply
  20. Skipper
    3hourtour Premium Member about 13 years ago

    Pab..looks like your point is being made for you..it seems people would be very upset with taking God out of the Bible

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    scrabblefiend  about 13 years ago

    Here’s a book for all those with questions about the translations of the Bible. Read the book “Misquoting Jesus–the story behind who changed the Bible & why” by Bart D. Ehrman. The author, a biblical scholar, traces the Bible & shows how things get mistranslated, or changed, or even lines being omitted because a monk fell asleep while copying and missed a line or two. Or some translators, not happy with women being given prominence in the early church, changed the woman’s name to a man’s. And so on, and so on. A good read.

     •  Reply
  22. Josette   13 march 2016   c
    Bill Thompson  about 13 years ago

    Editing clarifies meaning. Censoring destroys meaning.

     •  Reply
  23. Color maria yoshiwara 226x300
    librisleo  about 13 years ago

    Thank you, scrabblefiend. I didn’t have time to get back to this discussion, but that is the book I would have recommended. Others by the same author are just as informative and enlightening.

    BillThompson: not necessarily. One person’s editing can be another person’s censoring. It depends on your point of view.

     •  Reply
  24. Twitter avatar
    Pab Sungenis creator about 13 years ago

    All censoring is editing (to some degree) but not all editing is censoring.

     •  Reply
  25. Deficon
    Coyoty Premium Member about 13 years ago

    freeholder1 said, Certainly his earlier work was more Christian in nature. I guess, like the aging Carlin, he lost his way.

    I’d say he found it.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From New Adventures of Queen Victoria