Get Fuzzy by Darby Conley for July 17, 2017

  1. I yam who i yam
    Kind&Kinder  over 6 years ago

    Don’t Panic!

     •  Reply
  2. 2006 afl collingwood
    nosirrom  over 6 years ago

    I see he has the answer, but where’s his towel?

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    garcoa  over 6 years ago

    “just” a chew toy, Come on, Rob.

     •  Reply
  4. Chanter
    Brian Fink  over 6 years ago

    But Alan Rickman as Marvin did save what little was left to be saved in the movie.

     •  Reply
  5. Picture
    WoodstockJack  over 6 years ago

    Yes, the movie was terrible; the BBC series, however, was spot on.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Cozmik Cowboy  over 6 years ago

    Satchel is a frood who really knows where his towel is.

     •  Reply
  7. Celtic knot1 th
    UBBM Premium Member over 6 years ago

    How old is this comic?

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Daniel Jacobson  over 6 years ago

    I enjoyed both the book and the BBC series. I thought the “movie,” Rob mentioned was the BBC series. I apparently missed the movie, but, judging from the comments, I sure did not miss anything. Hollywood turned me off years and years ago.

     •  Reply
  9. Robpatch
    Baron Grim  over 6 years ago

    The film was just yet another incarnation. They all differ, and they all have parts that are endearing to hoopy froods who know where their towels are. First there was the original BBC radio version. Then the first two books & TV series were written somewhat together (yet still rather differently). Then the subsequent books and many years went by as Douglas Adams battled in LA to get the film production off the ground. Sadly, it malingered around the studios until after DNA died. The folks that put the film together did a good job, considering how big the Hitchhikers story had become. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. All those books, TV shows, Radioplays and Amateur dramatics. To squeeze all that into a 100 minute film was never going to please everyone. Also, to include NEW MATERIAL with a new character written by Douglas Adams himself… Why wouldn’t you love that!? (And, YES! DNA did change the script to include the Arthur/Trillian love interest himself. So don’t complain that Hollywood did it.) Now that a few years have gone by, dust off your DVD, relax, let go of your expectations, and watch it again. Sure, it’s not prefect, but it’s a fine, fun film. (And that opening musical number is great!)

     •  Reply
  10. Pa220005
    Fido (aka Felix Rex) Premium Member over 6 years ago

    Yes, I agree – all five books in the trilogy were fabulous. The BBC TV series was also wonderful. The movie, on the other hand, sucked. It sucked so much that a black hole wouldn’t have a chance against it.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    imagpa59  over 6 years ago

    what’s a book?

     •  Reply
  12. 14563329 10206652648148087 5460197690157967338 n
    josephz2va  over 6 years ago

    Oh God. Another remake of the movie? (shreds local movie card).

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Get Fuzzy