Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for August 21, 2010

  1. Zappa sheik
    ksoskins  over 13 years ago

    Hey, Jeff, tell him about that chopper you shot down; I’m sure he’ll be impressed. Leave out the part about it being a “friendly”.

     •  Reply
  2. Deviant avatar
    Orion-13  over 13 years ago

    Well, he’ll take after his father: They both write fiction.

    Orion

     •  Reply
  3. O p veteranpatch small
    randgrithr  over 13 years ago

    The improbability meter is definitely pegging in this one. :)

    Of course, most people don’t quite get the concept that intelligence communities are so incestuous that Flagg would already have Jeff’s full dossier, which would have been handed to him by whatever crony set up the interview in the first place.

    Trudeau just doesn’t understand that when the military and government keep files on people, those files DO get used. Maybe someone should explain SPN codes to him. :)

     •  Reply
  4. Andy
    Sandfan  over 13 years ago

    Jeff’s picture is in the dictionary next to the definition for clueless.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    mblase75  over 13 years ago

    “How does Flagg know the ‘Red Rascal’ is a kid”? Probably the spelling, the grammar, and the fact that it’s on MySpace.

     •  Reply
  6. What has been seen t1
    lewisbower  over 13 years ago

    We need private security in Iraq, especially since we withdrew all our troops (50.000 advisers don’t count) Maybe we can get them from Afghanistan now that they’re getting thrown out.

     •  Reply
  7. Packrat
    Packratjohn Premium Member over 13 years ago

    Yeah, randgrithr, let’s take all the fun out of the comics by making the writer explain in great detail how he arrived at his conclusions. Loved the line you added “most people don’t quite get the concept “. Wish i could speak for the masses like that! Would SPNs add to the enjoyment of the strip? A good cartoonist (and satirist) will keep it simple, for us simple masses.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    WaitingMan  over 13 years ago

    The only reason we need private security in Iraq is to keep Dick Cheney’s cronies awash in champagne and caviar.

     •  Reply
  9. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  over 13 years ago

    Hey, Look, At one time the number of “contract” employees in Iraq outnumbered the armed forces by over 10,000. It was the previous administration’s way of making up for the shortage of GIs. Plus it made a lucrative means of channeling our tax dollars to their cronies.

     •  Reply
  10. 061
    pawpawbear  over 13 years ago

    Maybe they need to send more “private contractors” to Afghanistan. Or do all of you libs want more heroin on our streets? Just a thought.

     •  Reply
  11. Mikeprice
    RenoMike  over 13 years ago

    You right-wing lemmings are too tiresome to read, too quick with copycat talking points to take seriously, and too ignorant to actually think Palinesque cliches might have any effect other than revulsion. This ain’t one of your political bleeep factories, so quit trying to fathom a comic strip that’s too far over your head, and quit trying to influence those of us who are WAY too smart for you. Go watch fox non-news, and beg a liberal to explain the big words to you. Jeez, what a confederacy of genuine dunces…

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    rotts  over 13 years ago

    spammerflaggen!

     •  Reply
  13. Jackcropped
    Nemesys  over 13 years ago

    Mice Prike, what are you talking about? Have you ever actually contributed to any discussion on this thread, beyond your occasional copy-and-paste comments directed towards anyone right of Chairman Mao?

    I think the diarrhea just builds up in you every couple weeks, and you let it spew in all directions like a flatulent goose impaled on a windmill.

     •  Reply
  14. 061
    pawpawbear  over 13 years ago

    What Nemesys said.

     •  Reply
  15. Bla   version 2
    FriscoLou  over 13 years ago

    Funny, but not in a “ha ha” way.

     •  Reply
  16. Big dipper
    SuperGriz  over 13 years ago

    “John Pike said, about 12 hours ago

    Maybe they need to send more “private contractors” to Afghanistan. Or do all of you libs want more heroin on our streets? Just a thought. ”

    Oh.. more heroin, definitely.

     •  Reply
  17. Phil b r
    pbarnrob  over 13 years ago

    Funny, that– Under the Taliban as a government, the poppy/opium/heroin trade was squelched. That consequence was just unacceptable (remember the ‘Secret Team’ from ContraGate? They didn’t go away.)

     •  Reply
  18. Keithmoon
    Wildcard24365  over 13 years ago

    @pbarnrob

    You don’t understand. The opium trade can only be squelched by more military operations funded by more borrowing from China.

    If you read your history, you’d understand that.

    Do I sound like a neocon, yet?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury