Mike Luckovich for April 02, 2014

It would be more accurate to portray him as the abusive husband who comes home and beats his wife with high taxes and then cowers outside the home, because basically a wife beater is a coward.

Both of these conditions cannot be true. Only the party that constantly denies climate change, evolution and science can think they are. (And, of course, neither of them are true.)

Regarding Benghazi, yes, let’s not forget. Let’s not forget that SIXTY Americans were killed in embassy and consulate attacks under Dubya. Where’s your outrage over that?

I’ll also note that these are easy to find with a search on EMBASSY DEATHS BUSH — several results come up.

You have to want to not find something that easy.

Ah, nice to see you again Masterkrain, I hope you’ve been well. First off, regarding any suicide bombing, how the hell are you supposed to stop that? That’s not a nine hour long siege, with the ambassador begging for help. I’m not denying that people have been killed over the years by attacks, I’m saying that in this particular case, help never came. Even the CIA compound was told to stand down. There was a Marine base that could’ve brought men over in an hour. There was a drone in the air, ready to strike, but the order was not given. That’s actually how Woods and Doherty died. one was holding the laser to guide the missile while the other was covering. Unfortunately the mortar fire killed them. The fact remains that Obama was notified, and did nothing, for nine long hours; but you know who saved the besieged Americans? friendly Libyan militia. They should’ve been rescued much sooner, and by an AMERICAN force, not a foreign one. Likewise, watch any interview with Obama on Benghazi, he always says that he has things under control, and that the investigation is going fine. Despite ONE AND A HALF years, nothing has still been uncovered, and no one has taken real responsibility. That’s the problem, of course, our president is busy golfing to worry.

Quick question, to satisfy my own curiosity, what source did you use to get your info?

Ah, nice to see you again Masterkrain, I hope you’ve been well. First off, regarding any suicide bombing, how the hell are you supposed to stop that? That’s not a nine hour long siege, with the ambassador begging for help. I’m not denying that people have been killed over the years by attacks, I’m saying that in this particular case, help never came. Even the CIA compound was told to stand down. There was a Marine base that could’ve brought men over in an hour. There was a drone in the air, ready to strike, but the order was not given. That’s actually how Woods and Doherty died. one was holding the laser to guide the missile while the other was covering. Unfortunately the mortar fire killed them. The fact remains that Obama was notified, and did nothing, for nine long hours; but you know who saved the besieged Americans? friendly Libyan militia. They should’ve been rescued much sooner, and by an AMERICAN force, not a foreign one. Likewise, watch any interview with Obama on Benghazi, he always says that he has things under control, and that the investigation is going fine. Despite ONE AND A HALF years, nothing has still been uncovered, and no one has taken real responsibility. That’s the problem, of course, our president is busy golfing to worry.

Quick question, to satisfy my own curiosity, what source did you use to get your info?

I proudly endorse the 2-term limit. There is nothing wrong with limiting the president’s power. Now just to move on to Congress….

Racist? how?

Okay, first off I seriously doubt the legitimacy of the article because it’s very friendly to Obama, and won’t incriminate him. Second, Chris Stevens died of smoke, in the most recent statement I read, which means that he could’ve easily been saved after the first hour. Also, considering that Stevens kept sending emails asking for help, shows that he was still alive for enough time to save him. Third, even if Stevens couldn’t of been saved, Woods, Doherty, and Smith could have been. And Finally, the whistleblowers of Benghazi never get press attention, and they are being oppressed, as is common with the Democratic Party.

Okay, first off I seriously doubt the legitimacy of the article because it’s very friendly to Obama, and won’t incriminate him. Second, Chris Stevens died of smoke, in the most recent statement I read, which means that he could’ve easily been saved after the first hour. Also, considering that Stevens kept sending emails asking for help, shows that he was still alive for enough time to save him. Third, even if Stevens couldn’t of been saved, Woods, Doherty, and Smith could have been. And Finally, the whistleblowers of Benghazi never get press attention, and they are being oppressed, as is common with the Democratic Party.

One more thing I noticed, that article was posted over a year ago, shortly after Benghazi happened, meaning that Obama was still trying to cover up the scandal. Of course any government run agency is going to vouch for their boss.

Nailed it! RWNJ’s have no shame or sense.

Let’s see, first, it’s no small fact that most of the press is biased. Ever watch MSNBC? CNN? pretty much most of the networks out there love Obama, and ridiculing me doesn’t change that.

Also, I brought up other facts to prove why I doubted the article. When a president can bring in a turkey to surprise the troops, then is hounded by the press, because they want to know whether the Turkey was fake or not, even though it doesn’t matter, but when a president can, let me just list some scandals: IRS targeting conservatives, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, executing legislative authority, not doing anything about the Black Panthers, closing down the veteran memorial, and forcing people to buy a crappy insurance, religious oppression, and GSA, just to list a few. Nonetheless, the press hasn’t taken up any of these. I think the bias is pretty obvious.

Finally, just because someone wrote an article, doesn’t mean that I have to agree with it. If I find faults, am I not inclined to format my own opinion? You are too, I am not demanding that you accept my stance, but I am defending my beliefs. Now, if you want to have a decent debate, don’t worry about insults, and put solid argument together.

Well I’m glad you recognize my freedom as I recognize yours. Now, I certainly felt insulted by certain parts of your comment, which I felt was an attempt to belittle me, if you truly meant no harm, than I am sorry for having accused you. However, regarding Obamacare, I think most of the facts point to themselves. However, there is one issue that I hate the most. In most instances, you are REQUIRED to buy Obamacare or else pay a fine, that is an insult to our freedom. If Obama wanted to offer an alternative healthcare that was not mandatory, this would be a whole other issue entirely. Also, with the recent restrictions of healthcare, my father lost a friend of his. He could no longer afford to see his cardiologist, so he had to pretty much sit around until he died. That is why I hate this “Afordable” Care Act, it is anything but, Also, this has been followed by a web of lies, most notably: “If you like your health care plan you can keep it.” Also, in a recent report from CNS News, while yes, 60,000 gained health insurance, 73,000 lost it. That’s 13,000 more people without healthcare. Katherine Sebelius also said (I’m somewhat paraphrasing), that to find out what’s in Obamacare, they’ll have pass it through Congress. I mean, really? Only idiots would let that satisfy them, and unfortunately that shows what most of Congress is made of.

Fox is the only medium doing its job. The rest just fall in line with democratic party.

Rubbish, Fox has about 30 liberals on their payroll. Debate is strong and they often let the viewer decide. Stop being a lemming and think for yourself. Oh, and learn how to spell.

Okay, my bad, thanks for correcting me. Do you have anything else helpful to add?