Walt Handelsman for February 28, 2014

  1. Qwerty01s
    cjr53  about 10 years ago

    Vetoed for economic reasons including the cost of litigation only to have it struck down as unconstitutional. Very unlikely because it was/is repugnant. Either way, it was the best answer. I would prefer it was vetoed because it is wrong morally, etc., and for economic reasons second. The way it is now, it shows we as Americans still have a very long way to true equality for all Americans.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    alexzabala  about 10 years ago

    You are wrong cjr53…yes the bill was stupid for many reasons but…..now the MILITANT GAYS can sue companies…it already happened in New Mexico…here it comes folks…get ready

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    alexzabala  about 10 years ago

    Whatever happened to the signs we read in restaurants: ‘We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone’?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    alexzabala  about 10 years ago

    Whatever happened to the signs we read in restaurants: ‘We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone’?

     •  Reply
  5. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 10 years ago

    ^It was called the “Civil Rights Act”, and wasn’t just applicable to racial designation…

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    alexzabala  about 10 years ago

    Exactly…so…if you own a cake decorating business and a Klu Klux Clan member wants to hire you to decorate a cake that says ‘Kill All Blacks’ can you refuse to do so without getting sued? Please answer me.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Walt Handelsman