So, if you don’t sell your goods to gay people, they won’t be gay anymore? lol lol. I know. Since you like referencing Nazis so much, you can just put them in concentration camps and starve them to death and then you won’t have to worry about them coming into a bakery asking for a cake for their wedding, which, of course by your argument, is the linchpin for the sinful marriage. Jesus. get a life.
That’s right, the bill didn’t mention homosexuals, Mdavis: which is why it allowed discrimination against almost anyone, or well, everyone, outside their “faith”. So those good Christians who wrote it, might get nervous if they’re in need of an EMT and a black/Muslim/ paramedic shows up at their accident, life in the balance, and they spout off their doggrel to transgender; HER!
Take note, social/religious conservatives. Republicans take your support for granted. They talk a good game.When the rubber hits the road, business, the almighty dollar, wins the day.They playin’ you fo’ suckas, they is.And have been since the time of Nixon.
And doesn’t it say you can stone your daugher for sassing you back; cutting off a neighbor’s hand; committing adultery isn’t a sin if your brother-in-law has gout. Something like that. Context is everything. Like the double-blend analogy too. The reason the men weren’t to lay with other men is because that doesn’t advance the Jewish peoples with more children. Of course, I’m going to hell probably because my heterosexual husband and I never wanted kids. And then we do love our cotton/poly clothes too!
In other words, there are so many more people who think it’s wrong that it doesn’t make economic sense to suck up to the minority of hateful bigots who proposed it in the first place. Well, if morality isn’t on the docket, practicality will have to do.
No you guys…you got it all wrong…as bad as the bill was….it is to protect people from getting sued by MILITANT GAYS… it already happened…Bill of rights Constitution…call it what you want…IT ALREADY HAPPENED IN NEW MEXICO! Hello..is anybody home?
Darsan54 Premium Member about 10 years ago
Yep, Brewer vetoes the bill for fiscal rather than moral reasons, but it still gets vetoed.
Rad-ish about 10 years ago
Democrats have never exploited gay people.
nate9279 about 10 years ago
So, if you don’t sell your goods to gay people, they won’t be gay anymore? lol lol. I know. Since you like referencing Nazis so much, you can just put them in concentration camps and starve them to death and then you won’t have to worry about them coming into a bakery asking for a cake for their wedding, which, of course by your argument, is the linchpin for the sinful marriage. Jesus. get a life.
pirate227 about 10 years ago
She’s not as dumb as she sounds.
Dtroutma about 10 years ago
That’s right, the bill didn’t mention homosexuals, Mdavis: which is why it allowed discrimination against almost anyone, or well, everyone, outside their “faith”. So those good Christians who wrote it, might get nervous if they’re in need of an EMT and a black/Muslim/ paramedic shows up at their accident, life in the balance, and they spout off their doggrel to transgender; HER!
charliekane about 10 years ago
Take note, social/religious conservatives. Republicans take your support for granted. They talk a good game.When the rubber hits the road, business, the almighty dollar, wins the day.They playin’ you fo’ suckas, they is.And have been since the time of Nixon.
majormarj about 10 years ago
And doesn’t it say you can stone your daugher for sassing you back; cutting off a neighbor’s hand; committing adultery isn’t a sin if your brother-in-law has gout. Something like that. Context is everything. Like the double-blend analogy too. The reason the men weren’t to lay with other men is because that doesn’t advance the Jewish peoples with more children. Of course, I’m going to hell probably because my heterosexual husband and I never wanted kids. And then we do love our cotton/poly clothes too!
Michael Peterson Premium Member about 10 years ago
In other words, there are so many more people who think it’s wrong that it doesn’t make economic sense to suck up to the minority of hateful bigots who proposed it in the first place. Well, if morality isn’t on the docket, practicality will have to do.
alexzabala about 10 years ago
No you guys…you got it all wrong…as bad as the bill was….it is to protect people from getting sued by MILITANT GAYS… it already happened…Bill of rights Constitution…call it what you want…IT ALREADY HAPPENED IN NEW MEXICO! Hello..is anybody home?