Steve Benson for January 31, 2014

  1. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member about 10 years ago

    A bit of difference don’t you think?

     •  Reply
  2. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member about 10 years ago

    You’re so right !!! If we really wanted to create a lot of jobs, wages would be outlawed and owners wouldn’t have to pay them anymore. I bet they would then hire lots and lots of people to work for them!! Problem solved! Just repeal the 13th!!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    moderateisntleft  about 10 years ago

    yeah, like those “owner/stakeholder’s” in china. they keep the workers in dorms so they can work longer hours and don’t need to worry about rent or commuting – we should have more of that “living wage” stuff here!

     •  Reply
  4. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  about 10 years ago

    Capitalism is based on the assumption that the goal is the maximization of profits. If a capitalist can increase his profits by lowering wages, then that’s what he should do. His wages have to be high enough to keep his workers alive, but if there is a surplus of workers, even that wage level isn’t necessary, since if one worker dies or gets too sick to work, there’s another worker to replace him. Of course this all sounds like a parody, but in the 1800s, that was pretty much the reality — read Thomas Mayhew, “London Labour and the London Poor”, or Dickens’ novel “Hard Times”, or Engels “The Condition of the Working Class in England”. Markets are wonderful, but they need to be regulated.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Quipss  about 10 years ago

    So lets say the average McDonalds sells roughly 80 burgers per hour.

    With 6 employees working.

    Take 6 × 4$

    divide over 80 burgers

    You see about 12% inflation in cost and 36% inflation in wage.

    So, yes it does help them

     •  Reply
  6. 2192946 misterfantastica
    eugene57  about 10 years ago

    Guess you never saw Bush 2’s 1 finger salutes..http://www.podcastingnews.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/bush-bird.jpg.http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1871/1101/1600/bushfinger2005.jpg.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v642/shakespeares_sister/shakes4/9.jpg.http://www.morphizm.com/images/observations/levine/bushfinger.jpg.https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-kPipY2Le5Gk/TYZ6-6Gup9I/AAAAAAAAKRg/RQONp_EZjRw/s1600/mfs0280.jpg.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WYJ-Fn9nCS0/Thk3mqj972I/AAAAAAAALYA/psFo1XDUZBE/s1600/bush+salute.jpg

     •  Reply
  7. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 10 years ago

    “To provide for the common defense”, means to today’s Republicans in Congress cutting my disabled retired Navy veteran son’s retirement pension (along with all retirees), and closing commissaries, while maintaining their OWN salaries and benefits. How “F’ing” loyal they are too our troops who’ve sacrificed so much for us.

    Going back to our early history I’ve now got a suggestion for all those “TEA party” Republicans in Congress: it was called tar and feathers and a ride out of town on a rail!!

     •  Reply
  8. 200
    Michael Peterson Premium Member about 10 years ago

    This makes no sense. The (apocryphal) remark of Marie Antoinette indicated that she didn’t understand poverty — she thought there was a shortage of bread in loaf form, so suggested they eat buns (cakes, not pastry) instead. Obama is saying just the opposite — that people have to be fed. If anything, it’s the Republicans who are insensitive to the issue, shrug it off and assume there are other ways to feed yourself. As the comments here indicate — it’s not so much a matter of being heartless as being ignorant. And heartless.

     •  Reply
  9. 2192946 misterfantastica
    eugene57  about 10 years ago

    but but you got nuttin of use.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Steve Benson