Chris Britt for September 09, 2013

  1. Missing large
    warjoski Premium Member over 10 years ago

    You can remember it all you like. The fact is Obama is now the one doing it. Bush doing it before him doesn’t change that fact in the slightest.

     •  Reply
  2. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 10 years ago

    Worth repeating my post elsewhere:.Given the international support for the new “Russian” plan to get everyone involved in Syria, not just the U.S., with a plan even Israel will endorse, and given Obama’s long reluctance to support war and military action, and Kerrry’s, is it possible they’ve just very wisely “punk’d” all the chickenhawks and morons?

    Let us hope the “community” will not only remove the offending weapons , but back it up with action in the ICC , that organization the US has refused to support in the past.

     •  Reply
  3. 1006
    sw10mm  over 10 years ago

    You have an odd definition of win canuck. o is a failure as this last diplomatic defeat shows yet again. Fortunately Putin was around to stop the idiot.

     •  Reply
  4. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  over 10 years ago

    Putin would have done nothing without the threat of a military strike. Obama would prefer to “speak softly and carry a big stick (T.R.)”. Unfortunately, Congress may weaken the President by removing the big stick.

     •  Reply
  5. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  over 10 years ago

    What would the tally be in terms of lives lost?

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    warjoski Premium Member over 10 years ago

    So…if Bush hadn’t lied, people would be fine with all the war?

    Bush was a bad president. That’s no excuse for Obama being one as well.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment