Song of Solomon, at least. But don’t worry, folks, it doesn’t go deeper than the woman’s chest ;)
Yes it does, but I won’t go into particulars!
There are some who contend the “navel” is actually referring to another, um, feature.
Well, good news, guys. In the original Hebrew AND Aramaic, the word doesn’t change. And given that Solomon says it’s ROUND it can’t possibly be anything else.It’s a NAVEL, geez…
They shouldn’t have, but are usually depicted as such in art.
The old, “What came first, the chicken or the egg?”, has a rather Darwinian answer: The egg. That egg was not laid by a chicken.
Yes. It’s where God poked them in the belly to check if they were done yet.
i_am_the_jam over 10 years ago
Song of Solomon, at least. But don’t worry, folks, it doesn’t go deeper than the woman’s chest ;)
jgarrott over 10 years ago
Yes it does, but I won’t go into particulars!
heligmyer over 10 years ago
There are some who contend the “navel” is actually referring to another, um, feature.
i_am_the_jam over 10 years ago
Well, good news, guys. In the original Hebrew AND Aramaic, the word doesn’t change. And given that Solomon says it’s ROUND it can’t possibly be anything else.It’s a NAVEL, geez…
AwelCruiz over 10 years ago
They shouldn’t have, but are usually depicted as such in art.
Lamberger over 10 years ago
The old, “What came first, the chicken or the egg?”, has a rather Darwinian answer: The egg. That egg was not laid by a chicken.
mrgromit over 10 years ago
Yes. It’s where God poked them in the belly to check if they were done yet.