A lot of Americans seem to think that this is fascinating because we have no kings. Of course, what a lot of ignorant American royal-watchers do not realize is that, since sovereignty is invested in the people in the US, that ALL Americans are equivalent to royalty.
Uh, Petts, that’s the point: He is special & important because he is royal. Much more important than the non-royal babies. He will live in a castle & go down in the history books as a king. He is a major part of history. The non-royal kids are not individually as significant, except to their own family & friends.
Don Winchester Premium Member over 10 years ago
What’s your point, Joel? That you’re jealous?
rockngolfer over 10 years ago
I heard 11,000 a day just in the USA.
Motivemagus over 10 years ago
A lot of Americans seem to think that this is fascinating because we have no kings. Of course, what a lot of ignorant American royal-watchers do not realize is that, since sovereignty is invested in the people in the US, that ALL Americans are equivalent to royalty.
echoraven over 10 years ago
“If only our conservatives would accept “all people” .”.They are as likely to do that as the liberals are to be honest and stop trying to scare people
Dr Lou Premium Member over 10 years ago
And each and every one of them is more important and far more relevant than the ‘royal baby.’
pam Miner over 10 years ago
Doesn’t anyone think about over-crowding?
rowena28 Premium Member over 10 years ago
Uh, Petts, that’s the point: He is special & important because he is royal. Much more important than the non-royal babies. He will live in a castle & go down in the history books as a king. He is a major part of history. The non-royal kids are not individually as significant, except to their own family & friends.