Nick Anderson for June 16, 2013

  1. Topzdrum 1w
    Hawthorne  almost 11 years ago

    Given the ongoing situation, I’d say that’s as effective as anything else.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Don Winchester Premium Member almost 11 years ago

    THIS is how Obama leads from behind…

     •  Reply
  3. Pig
    jonesb  almost 11 years ago

    We don’t need to be in Syria in any way, no weapons, no nothing. Let them sort it out.

     •  Reply
  4. 100 8161
    chazandru  almost 11 years ago

    Allies to the rebels need to send one bullet delivered by the right person to Assad’s head.However – I share the fears of other commentators concerned about Americans being killed, costs to taxpayers, failure to arm/support an actual ‘friend’ to the US, and other concerns that have been expressed. Syria is becoming the chessboard on this decades cold war playing field. Proxy wars between enemies are underway and no matter who wins, the people of Syria, and the region in general, have already lost.Sadly,but Respectfully,C.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Don Winchester Premium Member almost 11 years ago

    @Robert Landers…And here I thought you Left were concerned about human rights no matter where on Earth it was needed. But you just proved as long as politics come first.

     •  Reply
  6. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 11 years ago

    Chemical weapons, MAYBE used on less than 200 people, compared to 93,000 + deaths, was an idiotic line to draw in the sand, and BOTH “parties” here in the U.S. bought into it. That we have no clue who will replace Assad, or what, doesn’t exactly support interfering in a CIVIL WAR.

    btw: compare U.S. casualty figures in stopping Serbian atrocities to those in Grenada (to depose a government), Panama (to arrest one man), Iraq (to get one man), Afghanistan (to destroy a government WE put in power, and replace it with a man of OUR choice). “Death by misadventure” has long been more likely under Republican policies and commitments. (BTW: our real screwup that got us seriously into Viet Nam was in 1954 and “Ike’s people”, not the final stupid straw LBJ pulled out of the stack. Obama is just flirting with a straw man that Republicans and AIPAC have long been holding a match to in Iran. Assad is just “dupe of the day”.)

     •  Reply
  7. Bill   don
    derlehrer  almost 11 years ago

    My comment is addressed to Nick Anderson:.Trip wires work only when the wire doesn’t snap. If it breaks, the pin won’t be pulled on the grenade. Bad analogy, Sir.

     •  Reply
  8. Jollyroger
    pirate227  almost 11 years ago

    Keep up Anderson. We’re arming the rebels.

     •  Reply
  9. Pict0014
    dwilliams_72206  almost 11 years ago

    “Yes, since you have often said But Bush…. implies you opposed what Bush did and support Obama doing same thing Bush did”[]That is really convoluted, since not supporting Bush does not equate with supporting Obama. []I opposed what Bush did and I also oppose what Obama is doing.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Nick Anderson