Poor Obama is taking a 5% pay cut because of the budget crisis, so why is he wasting time and money going to Colorado to campaign for gun control? Shouldn’t he be in the White House doing something, isn’t that what he’s supposed to do?
Tax ammo? Tax gun owners with an insurance mandate?Talk about a regressive idea. So we make the most responsible gun owners, those who actually spend time training, pay for the 2 shots (of stolen ammo) fired by a criminal. The left really love their collective punishment don’t they?
Where’s Mr. 99% to protest that the radical rich will be allowed self-defense, but he won’t be able to afford it?
Both ideas are backwards anyway. If we’re going to add yet another tax, we should tax those who choose not to provide their own first line of defense. The cost of encouraging crime by providing a supply of defenseless victims should rest on those who shirk basic civil duties.
US Constitution, 2nd amendment, says “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”-IMO every restriction placed on people owning Arms, or being restricted from buying or trading Arms, or being restricted in purchasing Arms Ammo, or being mandated into spending personal money to buy “liability insurance”…every government restriction is an Unconstitutional Infringement!-P.S. Obama is dancing on the US Constitution, and dancing deliberately on the Constitution, while elsewhere trying to re-assure the American People that “Our Founders’ system ‘constrains me’ and so government cannot be tyranny or dictatorship….” DUH.
Chillbilly about 11 years ago
4. Tax ammo to pay for gun-related healthcare costs.5. Require liability insurance on every gun.
rabidhunter about 11 years ago
Poor Obama is taking a 5% pay cut because of the budget crisis, so why is he wasting time and money going to Colorado to campaign for gun control? Shouldn’t he be in the White House doing something, isn’t that what he’s supposed to do?
Rodent50 about 11 years ago
Tax ammo? Tax gun owners with an insurance mandate?Talk about a regressive idea. So we make the most responsible gun owners, those who actually spend time training, pay for the 2 shots (of stolen ammo) fired by a criminal. The left really love their collective punishment don’t they?
Where’s Mr. 99% to protest that the radical rich will be allowed self-defense, but he won’t be able to afford it?
Both ideas are backwards anyway. If we’re going to add yet another tax, we should tax those who choose not to provide their own first line of defense. The cost of encouraging crime by providing a supply of defenseless victims should rest on those who shirk basic civil duties.
disgustedtaxpayer about 11 years ago
US Constitution, 2nd amendment, says “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”-IMO every restriction placed on people owning Arms, or being restricted from buying or trading Arms, or being restricted in purchasing Arms Ammo, or being mandated into spending personal money to buy “liability insurance”…every government restriction is an Unconstitutional Infringement!-P.S. Obama is dancing on the US Constitution, and dancing deliberately on the Constitution, while elsewhere trying to re-assure the American People that “Our Founders’ system ‘constrains me’ and so government cannot be tyranny or dictatorship….” DUH.
d_legendary1 about 11 years ago
Let’s get it right Ramirez: ASSAULT RIFLE BAN STYLE.
No right winger has yet to produce any factual laws that prove that anyone wants to take their guns away.
pirate227 about 11 years ago
Wraithkin about 11 years ago
Probably be cheaper than what we (the conservatives) are paying now. Just sayin’. lol