ansonia retorted: “and if you had gone to the site you “appear” to be quoting, it would have been clear to you.”
If you read TTM’s post, he was actually clarifying it to Jack who had trouble reading the article. No, wait, he had trouble comprehending what he had read. What TTM suggested was that Jack is suffering from “Faux News” syndrome of making more out of a situation than there really was”; like you are now as it so happens!
Ansonia also demanded “So tell us where did Fox “made more of a situation than there really was” ? Please explain how you came to that twisted conclusion.”
No, TTM noted that Jack had made more of it, and compared his reaction to a generic comparison of the very site Jack was reading. TTM said : “Please do not take this as a personal attack”He was addressing Jack, not Faux news, and he did so in a friendly manner.
Fox news is a sensationalist news outlet; it is like most tabloids that make more out of a situation than there really is, hence the “sensationalist” moniker. That’s what TTM alludes to, not the article specifically.
Ansonia angrily lambasts “You are so close-minded and biased you have to twist the simplest of things to suit a Leftist agenda.”
Is your consistent defence of Faux News, here and elsewhere, also not a clear indication of your biased close-mindedness and right-wing-nut credentials?Such a staunch defence of a mere media outlet is puzzling. Do you own a stake in it? Are you in its employ? Why are you always so affronted whenever we mention Faux News? Everyone knows Faux news is Faux, don’t take it personally.
The English language is a very rich language, full of nuance. However, I think some folks don’t do nuance.
said "…If mechanic had gone to the website he quoted he would have understood that it WAS a Toyota. That fact appeared to go over his head. “
You simply won’t admit you’ve been caught out being wrong. I don’t ever say this on this forum but, my goodness, you are stupid.
You really wish to misconstrue what TTM said, don’t you? If you obstinately wish to ignore what was said, and after it was pointed out to you, twice, then you’re stupid, not just ignorant.
”You owe Fox an apology.“
Not only are you a Faux News apologist, you wish everyone else to apologise for it, too.
Ansonia screamed manically: ”HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, so you’re making a case that Fox news is not fair and balanced because they say they are????HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Ye gawds, this is what happens to Faux news viewers and apologists. They go stir crazy.
lonecat about 11 years ago
Ah, back to cars. The world is as it should be.
OmqR-IV.0 about 11 years ago
Is English not your mother tongue?
ansonia retorted: “and if you had gone to the site you “appear” to be quoting, it would have been clear to you.”
If you read TTM’s post, he was actually clarifying it to Jack who had trouble reading the article. No, wait, he had trouble comprehending what he had read. What TTM suggested was that Jack is suffering from “Faux News” syndrome of making more out of a situation than there really was”; like you are now as it so happens!
Ansonia also demanded “So tell us where did Fox “made more of a situation than there really was” ? Please explain how you came to that twisted conclusion.”
No, TTM noted that Jack had made more of it, and compared his reaction to a generic comparison of the very site Jack was reading. TTM said : “Please do not take this as a personal attack”He was addressing Jack, not Faux news, and he did so in a friendly manner.
Fox news is a sensationalist news outlet; it is like most tabloids that make more out of a situation than there really is, hence the “sensationalist” moniker. That’s what TTM alludes to, not the article specifically.
Ansonia angrily lambasts “You are so close-minded and biased you have to twist the simplest of things to suit a Leftist agenda.”
Is your consistent defence of Faux News, here and elsewhere, also not a clear indication of your biased close-mindedness and right-wing-nut credentials?Such a staunch defence of a mere media outlet is puzzling. Do you own a stake in it? Are you in its employ? Why are you always so affronted whenever we mention Faux News? Everyone knows Faux news is Faux, don’t take it personally.
The English language is a very rich language, full of nuance. However, I think some folks don’t do nuance.
OmqR-IV.0 about 11 years ago
said "…If mechanic had gone to the website he quoted he would have understood that it WAS a Toyota. That fact appeared to go over his head. “
You simply won’t admit you’ve been caught out being wrong. I don’t ever say this on this forum but, my goodness, you are stupid.
You really wish to misconstrue what TTM said, don’t you? If you obstinately wish to ignore what was said, and after it was pointed out to you, twice, then you’re stupid, not just ignorant.
”You owe Fox an apology.“Not only are you a Faux News apologist, you wish everyone else to apologise for it, too.
Ansonia screamed manically: ”HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, so you’re making a case that Fox news is not fair and balanced because they say they are????HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAYe gawds, this is what happens to Faux news viewers and apologists. They go stir crazy.