Would you be happy if the “loyal opposition” turned out to be disloyal? Anyway, I think Bob Woodward is more interested now in self-publicity than in breaking a news story.
True. Just because many people said that he said that he got bin Ladin does NOT mean that he said he got bin Ladin.
At least he didn’t say that he didn’t know or care where bin Ladin was or what he was doing, like what’s-his-name. But if Obama had said it, wouldn’t that have put lots of your knickers in a knot?
Michael Peterson Premium Member about 11 years ago
… which never happened.
edward thomas Premium Member about 11 years ago
Would you be happy if the “loyal opposition” turned out to be disloyal? Anyway, I think Bob Woodward is more interested now in self-publicity than in breaking a news story.
edward thomas Premium Member about 11 years ago
Besides, Nixon went in to office looking to get even. Obama found out he was playing defense from day 1!
ARodney about 11 years ago
As Obama himself said at the Gridiron dinner, what could a dispute with Bob Woodward possibly do to a sitting president?
rockngolfer about 11 years ago
This article in Slate answers a lot of questions about Woodward’s character.
http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2013/03/bob_woodward_and_gene_sperling_what_woodward_s_john_belushi_book_can_tell.html
I Play One On TV about 11 years ago
“Just like Obama got BinLaden—NEVER HAPPENED”
True. Just because many people said that he said that he got bin Ladin does NOT mean that he said he got bin Ladin.
At least he didn’t say that he didn’t know or care where bin Ladin was or what he was doing, like what’s-his-name. But if Obama had said it, wouldn’t that have put lots of your knickers in a knot?
pirate227 about 11 years ago