Brevity by Dan Thompson for March 11, 2013

  1. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Who says they’re superfluous?

    Get back to work, you!

    No more breaks and omissions…

     •  Reply
  2. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    msoedwards’ previous comment wasn’t showing even after I posted…. another GoComics time lapse….

    But yeah, I agree. I’ve never heard that!

    And I too thought the shirt might mean that the OED or another Oxford reference work had declared some superfluous….

    But certainly not HERE

     •  Reply
  3. Picture 22
    jack fairbanks  about 11 years ago

    alas, drinking again. he’s gone so dark since the proofreader purge. hi, shine, forgot to greet you at the sarkosy inkydink!

     •  Reply
  4. 11 06 126
    Varnes  about 11 years ago

    i thk its cuz we typ like this nw

     •  Reply
  5. 11 06 126
    Varnes  about 11 years ago

    400 years of proper English grammar out the window in less than a decade….

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Labyr1nth  about 11 years ago

    Grammar’s just grampaw’s wife these days.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    RonaldDavis  about 11 years ago

    The Oxford comma precedes “and” in a list of three or more items, as in “Tom, Dick, and Harry”. According to MS Word, one may either use it or not, but should be consistent in any one document.

     •  Reply
  8. Img 0813
    GoodQuestion Premium Member about 11 years ago

    They don’t have a lot in comma but she could make a postrophe happy . . . ☻

     •  Reply
  9. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  about 11 years ago

    A lot of people have no comma sense these days.

     •  Reply
  10. Mr. peabody
    Mrs. Peabody  about 11 years ago

    Without the (now optional, not obsolete) Oxford comma, we write things like:

    “I am a grammarian, writer and critic.”

    which is (to my mind) less clear than “I am a grammarian, writer, and critic.” As long as Oxford never makes the literal meaning of “literally” obsolete, I suppose I will survive. I will grumble, reminisce and complain; but I will survive.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Dave Thompson Premium Member about 11 years ago

    They’ll have to pry my Oxford comma from my dead, non-working keyboard.

     •  Reply
  12. Frog4
    Digital Frog  about 11 years ago

    She could do worse, at least he’s punctual.

     •  Reply
  13. 1964
    konradh  about 11 years ago

    http://oxforddictionaries.com/words/apostrophe

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    docredbird  about 11 years ago

    @Penny Robinson Fan Club: I think the “I’ve” and “we’ve” being spoken by the “character” in the comic do have an apostrophe, but are very small. Go back to the March 8 comic and you can see that they are typically this small in Brevity’s lettering. http://www.gocomics.com/brevity/2013/03/08

    People have always used superfluous apostrophes. (e.g. Apple’s for sale), but to my knowledge there is no initiative to “contract” the usage of apostrophes for contractions and possessives.

    JMHO, but I think the character is a comma and the the comic is referring to the commas that precedes the “and” in a series of three or more. (like Ronald Davis cited). e.g. “The three musketeers were Athos, Porthos, and Aramis”

     •  Reply
  15. Imagescaiw0lwc
    imbaldeagle  about 11 years ago

    Could be either a comma or an apostrophe. But I think “both” because he says “we’ve become superfluous”. With the amount of texting and careless e-writing today, there are many times when both are used wrongly – thus becoming unnecessary except for technical writings. Right write, Susan?

     •  Reply
  16. Large tv test pattern  color
    Lyons Group, Inc.  about 11 years ago

    An apostrophe is just a comma that worked its wayup to the top.

     •  Reply
  17. Cartoon horse
    Hakuna Matata  about 11 years ago

    Comma to the top!

     •  Reply
  18. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    I was trained… blue-penciled, red-circled, and lectured…. NEVER to put an apostrophe before “and” unless it’s to separate a clause from the rest of the sentence.

    I proofread my writing, even here, and remove such unnecessary apostrophication (Take THAT, Webster’s!) before printing or posting.

    I could have left it?NOW they tell me.

    DISCLAIMER:The apostrophe before “and” in ¶ 2 separates a clause and IS necessary.

     •  Reply
  19. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Baldy…. you always write right!

     •  Reply
  20. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Hi Nazz! S’OK, you did now.

     •  Reply
  21. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    But… sniffle…. Varnes doesn’t say “hi” to me any more….

     •  Reply
  22. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    X! …. yes!

    Itapostrophes always a pleasure…though you havenapostrophet given me many chances lately.

    Good to see you.

     •  Reply
  23. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Comma ♫ comma comma ♫ comma Comma chameleon… ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ You come ♫ ♪ and go-o-o… ♪You come ♪ and go. ♫

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    K M  about 11 years ago

    What does he mean, superfluous? He has plenty of jobs in improperly formed plurals!! Or plural’s!!

     •  Reply
  25. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Pschearer….

    LOL…I’ve posted this a few times on a couple of forums, in a general way…

    Maybe it’s time again….

    If you actually want to reach me…. CLICK HERE.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    hippogriff  about 11 years ago

    Eats, Shoots, and Leaves: The best book on punctuation around.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Brevity