Fred Basset by Alex Graham for October 25, 2012

  1. Dscf8802 icon
    loveofabove  over 11 years ago

    it’s not “exponential,” but over that amount of time, the interest compounds

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    BigChiefDesoto  over 11 years ago

    I’ll just bet that when England went to decimal coinage instead of pounds, shillings and pence, that 99 percent of the kids in England after that lost the ability to do that!

    It takes LOTS of practice and there is nothing that promotes practice as much as making sure you get the right change when you buy something!

    It’s for the same reason that I oppose the whole metric system! If you can’t deal with there are 12 inches in a foot, you need a course in bonehead arithmetic instead of a new measuring system!!

    Sorry, Fred, if I could see it written out like in this strip, I could do that, but I’m NOT good at holding numbers in my head while I try to figure out the answer all in my memory!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Gator007  over 11 years ago

    I got 168

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    p10knee  over 11 years ago

    Might want to rethink that. The answer is 252.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Chris Kenworthy  over 11 years ago

    I guess I read too quickly – I didn’t even stop to try it before reading the Missus’ answer.

     •  Reply
  6. Penguins
    James Hopkins  over 11 years ago

    Took me about 35 or 40 seconds. I was never very good at doing math in my head.

     •  Reply
  7. Mr. connolly
    gcarlson  over 11 years ago

    One of my favorite games while commuting is to break license plate numbers down into their prime factors.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    cstewart23  over 11 years ago

    I don’t even understand the question.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    cuentatemporaldg-registros  over 11 years ago

    I can’t make the calculations and count how long it takes at the same time, and I don’t have a chronometer. I did the part within the parentheses first (6), then divide by 2 (3), multiply by 12 (36) and then by 7 (252), but I don’t know how long it took me.

     •  Reply
  10. 2007 may jude1
    JudeDog  over 11 years ago

    Hey, I did it in only 10 seconds (the calculator helped)!

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    retread2  over 11 years ago

    My Dear Aunt Sally: Multiply – Divide – Add – Subtract

     •  Reply
  12. Tarot
    Nighthawks Premium Member over 11 years ago

    troll

     •  Reply
  13. D4a5a14f f69d 431f a7b7 321b5406dd5d
    Jkiss  over 11 years ago

    Now kids…..play nice already will ya. Jerry be proud of the math geek that you are. Wish I could be one too but alas, I had to write it out. Too many numbers to keep straight with all the other junk rattling around up there. Didn’t take too long, but I know it wasn’t close to 22 seconds. I did get the correct answer so YAY me.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment