Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   margueritem said, over 3 years ago

   Lol!
2. 

   Woody 157 said, over 3 years ago

   So, moon them back. If they have cameras that will take clear pictures of the stars then they can take pictures of your… Lets just say, of your mooning the back.
3. 

   runar said, over 3 years ago

   It’s been around a hundred years since people at observatories actually looked through telescopes. It’s all done with cameras now.
4. 

   Avid Reader said, over 3 years ago

   Hah. “Mooning”. I geeeeet it.
5. 

   A Scented Flower said, over 3 years ago

   They’re Shakin’ their Dingle Berries at ’ya….
6. 

   LingeeWhiz said, over 3 years ago

   @SavannahJack

   Damn you, Obama you mean?
7. 

   LingeeWhiz said, over 3 years ago

   @Woody 157

   Sorry to inform you but the space station cameras cannot take pictures of the backside (of the moon.)
8. 

   Quartermain MILLER said, over 3 years ago

   moon over miami
9. 

   Bailed out said, over 3 years ago

   @A Scented Flower

   I googled “dingleberry” and was really surprised – try it.
10. 

    Saskfan said, over 3 years ago

    @LingeeWhiz

    if you WANT a space program, why are you a Republican supporter? They’re the ones who are forcing your government to stop funding such frivolous stuff as science and edukashun. If you approve of literacy and science, then write and talk to your elected officials; ALL of them, and learn to study what they’re really saying when they make absurd promises. Don’t be sheepish about insisting that your elected officials work for YOUR benefit, not their rich friends’ benefit.
    
    Of course, if you are one of the Republicans’ rich friends, you can afford to ignore the real world’s troubles.
11. 

    Saskfan said, over 3 years ago

    @runar

    Many amateur astronomers still look through their telescopes and binoculars; it’s not quite all done with cameras now. Professional observatories actually rely quite heavily on amateurs’ observations for some work, especially for novas and variable star work.
    
    Oh, and the I.S.S. may not have to be temporarily abandoned after all; the Russians have determined the cause of the Soyuz crash and are working on getting their program running again. NASA’s also working with private enterprise to get commercial craft into space.
12. 

    Woody 157 said, over 3 years ago

    @Saskfan “NASA’s also working with private enterprise to get commercial craft into space.”

    .
    Please tell me that Haliburton is NOT being offered another ‘no bid contract’. We may be safe on that point cause Chaney is not in vice-power now. But then we may not be. He just released his manifesto. Is he preparing to try to ‘storm the castle’?
13. 

    Woody 157 said, over 3 years ago

    @Bailed out

    I followed your suggestion…WOW! Then I chased it from there:
    .
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110727153145AAll735
    .
    On the bottom of the page are 4 more entries, I didn’t follow them. Bur, #’s 2, 3, & 4 can be taken several different ( and interesting ways ). Thanks for a jolly good laugh.
14. 

    Hillbillyman said, over 3 years ago

    CHILL FOLKS…IT’S JUST CARTOON
15. 

    hippogriff said, over 3 years ago

    Saskfan: Don’t forget comets. Amateurs find far more comets than the pros do (who are usually booked solid on other projects).
16. Load the rest of the comments (1).