Comments (32) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   motivemagus said, 10 months ago

   Yeah, got THAT right. Strange how the right wing has taken essentially the same approach to science as Soviet Russia: it must align with the political beliefs first and reality second. Lysenko would be proud.
2. 

   MortyForTyrant said, 10 months ago

   @motivemagus

   It’s even worse. Russia made it into space on their own, despite the politics, but Virginia could drown and the GOP would try to legislate the water away by defining water as “condensed fog” or something…
3. 

   Ketira shena Pretarasedrin said, 10 months ago

   Notice it’s a Republican that wants to fudge the truth to support its own agenda?
   This is why the organization known as the Union of Concerned Scientists was created. They wanted to end what the Shrub was doing to government paid scientists.
4. 

   Ms. Ima said, 10 months ago

   @Ketira shena Pretarasedrin

   Now we need an organization to end what the global warming crazies lies.
5. 

   Ms. Ima said, 10 months ago

   @Ketira shena Pretarasedrin

   Now we need an organization to end the global warming crazies’ lies
6. 

   Rockngolfer said, 10 months ago

   For those who have plenty of time, here is a 17 minute film from one of the TED meetings explaaining climate change and such things as tipping points.
   http://www.flixxy.com/climate-change-is-simple.htm
7. 

   John Bollinger said, 10 months ago

   @Rockngolfer

   Thank you Sir! It was very informative!
8. 

   Quipss said, 10 months ago

   Trust me a bachelor of general science doesn’t translate to being a scientist, unless 30000 new scientists appear every year (the present level of science bachelors attained per year) I looked at the various fields and found roughly 1000, signatures relevant to the field

   Biophysics (68)
   Aerospace Engineering (587)
   Statistics (112)
   Environmental Science (253)
   Geochemistry (63)
   Ecology (76)
9. 

   mdavis4183 said, 10 months ago

   It’s Democrats and LIEberals who have perverted scirence.
10. 

    ahab said, 10 months ago

    @ScottPM

    Signatures do not in themselves present ANY proof whatsoever that man made global warming is not real. A scientific theory based on a body of evidence, factual, that can be peer reviewed and tested. Global warming is not discredited by a lazy pile of signatures. Let them present some PROOF.
11. 

    dtroutma said, 10 months ago

    Anthropogenic climate change was proven regionally, North Africa and Europe, in the 1950’s, much because of manipulating the land, not just CO2 or atmospheric gases. Globally, it’s been tracked, and proven, and our impacts are more than just “climate/weather” simplifications. The biosphere is being radically changed by our activities, not for the better, and never before seen as a result of “natural” process. Plastics, sewage, and “trash” weren’t being spewed around by dinosaurs, or Pleistocene “critters”.
12. 

    MortyForTyrant said, 10 months ago

    @Ketira shena Pretarasedrin

    I’m a HUGE fan of the UCS. Their series
    “Fission Stories” (about near misses in
    the nuclear industry) by David Lochbaum is the
    best way to cut your hair. You read a story, your
    hair stands on end, you use the machine, done…
13. 

    rightisright said, 10 months ago

    OMG, just give out the address to Algore’s carbon credit scam….
14. 

    Ms. Ima said, 10 months ago

    Just drop a couple of nukes for global cooling and global warming will end.
15. 

    Rockngolfer said, 10 months ago

    @John Bollinger

    I’m glad to hear from you. Some of the most interesting videos are long.
16. Load the rest of the comments (17).