Clay Bennett by Clay Bennett

Clay Bennett

Comments (30) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. charliekane

    charliekane said, about 2 years ago

    ;^)

  2. nz4m60

    nz4m60 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Huh?

  3. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Ignoring the LGBT issue, the “religious right” in this country is already trying to implement “Sharia” with regard to women’s rights to contraception, and yes, “abortion”, out to give “citizenship” to fertilized eggs no less. They sound like “Foghorn Leghorn”, but sadly, aren’t just cartoon characters.

  4. ODon

    ODon said, about 2 years ago

    Chuckle, chuckle…

  5. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    I presume this means same sex relationships are a violation of Sharia law? That wouldn’t surprise me…

  6. Stephen

    Stephen said, about 2 years ago

    @mickey1339

    In some Muslim-majority countries, homosexual activity is punishable by death.

  7. Lynne B

    Lynne B GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Marriage has traditionally been a wide variety of things, in fact it’s been all over the map when you take the map into consideration. Men, women, multiples — if you think that the current definition is “it”, you’ve clearly never spent much time reading history or anthropology.

  8. Lynne B

    Lynne B GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    YOUR god, YOUR rules. Leave the rest of us out of it.

  9. PianoGuy24

    PianoGuy24 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @Lynne B

    Yet you want to push YOUR ways on the rest of America!

  10. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, about 2 years ago

    ZING!!!

  11. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, about 2 years ago

    Nonsense again. I am looking up my reference (Sex, evolution, and behavior by Daly & Wilson), but as I recall a study of 847 human cultures found that 84% of them permitted polygyny (multiple wives), roughy 16% were monogamous, and four permitted polyandry (multiple husbands). Unlike most other species, the thing that stands out about humanity is its range of behavior.
    So your assertion that “marriage is between one man and one woman” simply does not hold up. And I’m not even getting into the question of homosexual marriages, which some studies indicate were held by the Catholic Church!
    Personally, I am happily monogamist, but I am not foolish enough to impose my preferences on the whole world and claim they are universal.

  12. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    “The LORD GOD said it is SIN

    According to your book of morals, not mine. Your same god said it’s perfectly OK to own slaves and beat them to near death. I shouldn’t have to abide by your beliefs to obtain equality any more than you should have to abide by mine.

  13. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @PianoGuy24

    “Yet you want to push YOUR ways on the rest of America!”

    What a load of crap. If gays were allowed marriage equality, it wouldn’t force you marry someone of the same gender. The Catholic Church already refuses to acknowledge marriages not blessed by the Church. They’re more than welcome to not acknowledge gay marriages as well. Keep your religion out of my equality.

  14. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Marriage is between one man and one woman, no Law will ever change that

    That is a stupid and false assertion. The definition of marriage has already changed several times in the US. Back in the dark days of slavery (which was perfectly okay according to your Bible), blacks were not allowed the benefit of marriage. Slave traders thought nothing of selling husbands and wives to different plantation owners. After slavery was abolished, inter-race marriages were illegal. Marriage was again redefined to include inter-race couples. The Bible’s King Salomon and King David both had many, many wives. Following suit, the Mormons originally defined marriage as between a man and as many women as he wanted. They redefined their idea of marriage in an attempt at wider public acceptance of their faith.

    All of that aside, you’re still judging marriage based on your faith. I have a right to my own beliefs and equality under the law.

  15. PianoGuy24

    PianoGuy24 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @Jase99

    If you think we’re going to sit idle and not stand up for what’s right you have another thing coming. You think YOU’RE the only ones that can push? You got another thing coming!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (15).