Chuck Asay by Chuck Asay

Chuck Asay

Recommended

Comments (55) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, about 1 year ago

    One is legal – the other isn´t.

  2. jonesb

    jonesb said, about 1 year ago

    @Tue Elung-Jensen

    Wrong, both are illegal since he aborted third term babies.

  3. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, about 1 year ago

    @jonesb

    Yeah, just read about it – thought it was something else.

  4. pdchapin

    pdchapin said, about 1 year ago

    I haven’t seen much coverage in either case. Murder is usually a local story. I’ve seen passing mention of both stories in the national media but nothing sustained.

  5. MrJimCos

    MrJimCos said, about 1 year ago

    “satanic crank”? Really? Resorting to childish name-calling does not support your own position. It merely helps demonstrate that you are a member of a particular category. (If your comments prior to that hadn’t already.)

  6. Captain Colorado

    Captain Colorado said, about 1 year ago

    Ignore the main-stream media. Think for yourself.

  7. hoyacougar

    hoyacougar said, about 1 year ago

    Mr King is correct. All media is a business. There is no ‘msm’ conspiracy. Rants about ‘msm’ are really code for ‘I hunt down news sites that agree with me and only read those.’ No bias there is there?

  8. Jeff H

    Jeff H said, about 1 year ago

    @Tue Elung-Jensen

    Murdering delivered babies by “snipping” their spinal cords is legal? Where do you live???

  9. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, about 1 year ago

    @Tue Elung-Jensen

    But neither is moral/right. Legal and moral are not always synonymous, such as in the case of it being legal to “choose” to murder your own child.

  10. John Orr

    John Orr said, about 1 year ago

    I’ve seen plenty of coverage of this trial. Asay isn’t happy because it isn’t front page on every news outlet every day.

  11. dtriedel

    dtriedel GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    ^You are right, sir. I have read plenty as well.

  12. PlainBill

    PlainBill said, about 1 year ago

    I’d say Chucky has it backwards. I’ve seen plenty of news stories about the ‘Doctor’ performing third term abortions, an illegal and reprehensible act. I’ve seen nothing recently about the murder of a doctor who performed abortions. Googling, googling…. OK, so Ass-ay is comparing current coverage to that of three years ago…. ‘Satanic Crank’ seems a bit harsh. Conservative Crank would be more appropriate.

  13. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 1 year ago

    There isn’t enough news to fill a 24-hour period. Therefore we get “info-tainment”. CNN shows us cute kittens. Fox shows us a student who is “brave” enough to lead a school function with a prayer. Both report news, but not all day long, and they favor stories that their marketing analysts tell them that their particular audiences favor. It is unfortunate that we have lost the concept of investigative reporting, as many important stories get no attention, or not enough. This is applicable to all news outlets, regardless of their owners/content providers.

    And you get a lot of “I’m standing on a street corner, where 18 hours ago something happened. Nothing’s happening now, certainly on this same street corner, but I’m here to remind you about what you heard about all day.”

  14. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, about 1 year ago

    @Tue Elung-Jensen

    “One is legal – the other isn´t.”

    Wrong as usual.

  15. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, about 1 year ago

    @Tue Elung-Jensen

    “Yeah, just read about it – thought it was something else.”

    No, thought never entered into your comment.

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (40).