Comments (27) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   toasteroven said, about 1 month ago

   Is Yakety Sax playing in the second panel?

2. 

   ahab said, about 1 month ago

   Very Cute, I LOVE BENNIE. Thanks for the laugh senor. The sax makes the comic come to life toaster!

3. 

   jukeofurl said, about 1 month ago

   Asay? isn’t that name tautological?

   BTW sir, you know nothing about the facts of that situation & neither does anyone else in media. Doesn’t your “bible” include the part about casting stones? or did somebody edit it as they did with a few other important things?

4. 

   Ronshua said, about 1 month ago

   Sorry but maybe it should be .

   http://www.tyndalearchive.com/Scriptures/www.innvista.com/scriptures/compare/story.htm

5. 

   omQ R said, about 1 month ago

   Chuck: Why does he still have his job? Because he owns his own company. He is his own boss.

6. 

   scottfreitas said, about 1 month ago

   Wrong. Letterman doesn’t own CBS, Lefty.

   Isn’t any job I’ve ever had where I could do what Letterman did and not be fired. And given it was Leftists who hit us with all the Feminist-dictated “sexual harassment laws”, it gets old seeing ONLY Leftists get away with violating these laws nonstop, without being punished.

   Sexual immorality and Leftists go hand in glove, though. They’re amoral, what do you expect?

   The hallmark of Leftists is making laws which they don’t obey. Godly people know them to be fools and liars; I guess we need to stop expecting better from them.

7. 

   Jim said, about 1 month ago

   @ toasteroven : Yes .

8. 

   HOWGOZIT said, about 1 month ago

   Sad that libs can only rebut by bringing up Limbaugh, Beck and Palin–their reply to every issue.

9. 

   bewoolner said, about 1 month ago

   Limbaugh, Beck and Palin are only the most obvious examples. Since cons can’t seem to catch on to subtlety we have to use the most obvious examples or they’re left scratching their heads. You know, the old “hit them in the head with a hammer” strategy. Half the time they can’t even get it then.

   And scottfreitas, it’s the “God Fearing” righties who seem to pass all the anti-sex laws. We only point out the hypocrisy when you guys can’t seem to live up to the laws that you scream so loudly for.

10. 

    edrush said, about 1 month ago

    No, Letterman doesn’t own CBS, but he DOES own Worldwide Pants, the company that produces the show. And thanks for the laugh, with your “hallmark of Leftists is making laws which they don’t obey.” I’ve lost count of how many gay-bashing wingnuts turn out to be gay themselves. Or how many Bible-thumping fanatics turn out to be humping other women.

11. 

    mgscott said, about 1 month ago

    scottfreitas said,
    “Isn’t any job I’ve ever had where I could do what Letterman did and not be fired. ”

    You should go into politics like John Ensign.

12. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 1 month ago

    F^cking is not a crime. It can be considered morally wrong in some circumstances but if we fired everyone who had sex with a person they weren’t married to, we’d wouldn’t have many people working except big heads like stripy and scotty who think they can look down their noses at everyone else.

    Sex is not a crime, If it weren’t part of all of your ancestor’s lives, you wouldn’t be here.

13. 

    dtroutma said, about 1 month ago

    When a Haggard or Baker, or any of the other “preachers” get caught, it’s okay, ‘cause they’re “saved”. Comedians have a sense of humor, so are obviously just sinners with no hope of “redemption”.

14. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 1 month ago

    “It’s only funny when the person has dignity”
    -Krusty the Clown

15. 

    bradwilliams said, about 1 month ago

    Lets be clear Letterman is niether a liberal nor a conservative. He is a capitalist. He doesnt give a bleeep as long as he can get a laugh and make a buck.

16. 

    Magnaut said, about 1 month ago

    you arte right there are no liberal capitalists other than.Michael Moore, Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi…need I go on

17. 

    Loco80 said, about 1 month ago

    Why is the answer for so many of you that weakness is easy, so therefore it is acceptable? Doing the right thing is never easy, so to claim that so many have failed, therefore failure is right? What a perverted society we have become!

18. 

    DrCanuck said, about 1 month ago

    Loco80: You may be overlooking a difference between that which is “acceptable” and that which is “right.” Can you not envision a perspective where one may think extra-marital affairs are not right, but one can be tolerant of other people’s failings and accept them for who they are as opposed to who they should be?

    We humans have so many failings that not accepting others because of any failings would make us very lonely people. But we don’t have to see their behaviour as right.

19. 

    Loco80 said, about 1 month ago

    We are getting to the point of splitting hairs. We must accept the person,despite their weaknesses, but cannot condone the action of their weakness. Yes, the weakness of the flesh has overcome even those with the best of intentions. That does not make it right to accept those actions as appropriate, nor does it made it right for us as humans to bleeep those offenders.

20. 

    believecommonsense said, about 1 month ago

    loco, you’ve got a new avatar, but I can’t tell what it is … what is it?

21. 

    NoFearPup said, about 1 month ago

    David Letterman should be the Icon of what the American Female doesn’t like. Old man in power, just accidentally having affairs with young powerless interns…Don’t see it on these posts.

22. 

    cdward said, about 1 month ago

    loco’s avatar is a locomotive, I think.

    pup, it is indeed a bad thing, and certainly the (old) man in power having affairs with young powerless women (don’t have to be interns) is a stereotype based in longstanding and sad reality. As you know, it’s well before Letterman, but if you want him to be the poster boy for it, fine by me.

    As to the cartoon, of course it all depends on the ratings. It always has. If people buy it, it doesn’t matter how rotten or harmful or immoral the product is. That’s capitalism.

23. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 1 month ago

    He didn’t lie to a grand jury, why do you want him out?

    Right away, we see all clearly (if it wasn’t clear already) what the lewinsky scandal was all about.

24. 

    DrCanuck said, about 1 month ago

    Loco, are you saying it’s “splitting hairs” to distinquish between the behaviour and the person who is exhibiting the behaviour?

    Is it splitting hairs to see a difference between telling a child “That is bad behaviour” versus “You are a bad child”?

    Can you not accept the child while rejecting the behaviour?

25. 

    believecommonsense said, about 1 month ago

    Puppy, you asked so I’ll share my view. I really wish I didn’t know any of this. But it was bound to become public, so Letterman chose to attempt to manage the disclosure. We don’t really know entertainment figures, but I’m disappointed in Letterman’s behavior. It does seem to be private behavior because no member of his staff has made any harassment charges.

    Nonetheless, for a boss, any boss, to fool around with staff members is a very bad idea for a host of reasons. That makes Letterman guilty of boorish behavior apart from the morality of having affairs outside of a long standing relationship

    I think what may end up biting letterman on the keister even more is that he stated the affairs were prior to marriage, a statement that may serve as a red flag in front of a bull as some media will try to determine if that is 100 percent true. Remember Gary Hart telling reporters he was so innocent they could follow him around? One of them did and there was Donna Rice.

    Boorish, icky, tacky, any number of adjectives apply but he’s not a public figure earning public dollars.

26. 

    DrCanuck said, about 1 month ago

    Hey, Loco; where’d ya go?

    Hope you didn’t think that was an attack on you; just going after your ideas for the sake of discussion. Rereading what I wrote, I could have phrased it better.
    You may well be the only conservative on these pages capable of intelligent thought. I value that and want to pick your brain to find out what makes you tick.

27. 

    d_legendary1 said, about 1 month ago

    Cause he’s letterman.