Chuck Asay by Chuck Asay
- June 03, 2009
- From Beginning
- Previous feature
- Show Calendar
- Next feature
- Current
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this or any other comic strip daily emailed daily. Comics and Editorial Cartoons are updated everyday so there is always something new.
With a free account you will receive one comic from your Personalized Comic Page daily. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and get all of your comics emailed daily plus receive unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Chuck Asay sifts the events of the day through his biblical worldview and tries to persuade readers to see things his way...that rights are given by a higher authority than the governments of men, that mankind is not the ultimate arbiter of truth and that our Constitutional Republic is worth protecting. Chuck believes ideas, not politicians rule the world. He tries to protect ideas which he thinks are good and attacks ideas he thinks bring harm.
© 2009 Creators Syndicate - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2009. UCLICK LLC, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy


Comments (8) Jump to Comments Form
dtroutma said, 5 months ago
Chuck needs to check the history of what Appeals Court, and Supreme Court decisions HAVE led to. Sotomayor’s comment was quite accurate. Legal decisions DO mandate policy. Unconstitutional policies ARE blocked by the court, well until Bush.
Anthony 2816
said,
5 months ago
Looks like the last time Asay learned anything about our government was in the 6th grade.
Unfortunately, most Americans are the same.
All three branches make law.
The legislature makes the black-letter law.
The executive branch makes regulations (like income tax laws) and presidential orders (like Bush’s law to put us eight years behind in stem cell research).
And the judiciary makes jurisprudence or common law, like “Innocent until proven guilty”.
If you go look around a law library, you’ll find most of it is devoted to the latter.
NoFearPup
said,
5 months ago
IMHO, you’re both wrong: the “making” of policy by the judicial branch comes under their mandate to “interpret” laws that are already there, or are suggested by other policy. The Executive branch “makes” laws under the powers its already deemed to be in charge of under its seperation of powers. And all of this confusion can and would disappear if the jokers we elect to the U.S. Congress would start doing their job and stand on principles rather than reward the special interests that paid to get them there.
believecommonsense
said,
5 months ago
just get on with it, hold hearings and vote! stop playing to the media and do your job
Anthony 2816
said,
5 months ago
Puppy, your confusion, like that of most Americans, has nothing to do with Congress.
It has to do with applying a sixth-grade education to the real world.
mytinytown said, 5 months ago
Anthony 2816
Stem cell research (from Embryos) will never work. So Bush did the right and intelligent thing. But how would you explain that to those who fell a baby is not a baby till it is out of the womb and wanted by the mother.
Ian Valenzuela
said,
5 months ago
Alito and Scalia are on the record as saying the same thing. Please show me the cartoons where you opposed their confirmations. If not, please admit you are not opposing Sotomayor on principle, only on partisanship.
anat622 said, 5 months ago
Pfft. The woman has a judicial record of hundreds and hundreds of cases. Taken as a whole, they show her judicial philosophy much more reliably than two comments taken out of context. The fact that some (but not all!) Republicans latch onto these comments shows that either a) her judicial record is mostly unobjectionable, or b) they’re just too lazy to go through it or even have their staffers summarize it, or c) both.