Chip Bok by Chip Bok

Chip Bok

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    They can do that AFTER finishing the shrubs audit!
    He’s going to need to provide the name and S.S.N. of EVERY Serviceperson who died in his unnecessary wars, AND to account for EVERY DOLLAR that was “Lost or Misplaced” during them, as well.

  2. Baleine

    Baleine said, 11 months ago

    @Doctor Warbucks

    Are you in public office? You sound just like most of congress.

  3. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, 11 months ago

    The New York Times has a detailed report on Benghazi that says that President Obama and Secretary Hillary told the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth. (Shortly after that, McCoy had a cartoon of the Press taking a bullet for Hillary.)

    The official White House line was that, since President Obama’s drones have completely destroyed al Qaeda and all other terrorist organisations, the attack was an act of terror, NOT by a terrorist organisation, but by Islamic fundamentalists outraged by a video, and the video is entirely responsible for the deaths of the Ambassador and three other Americans. The New York Times article linked above says this is entirely correct.

    It is not altogether clear to me why it matters whether the attack was by card-carrying members of Al Qaeda or by Islamists who were not members of any terrorist organisation. Nor do I think it matters if the attack was completely spontaneous in response to the video, or planned. But these are the two points where the Tea types scream, ‘These are the lies that led to the death of the Ambassador.’ I can’t see the Tea logic.

    A reporter who, unlike the Times reporters who get their stories from the always 110% truthful US government information office (a reporter who is obviously unaffiliated with the New York Times) says the official US government version of how the Ambassador and three other Americans got killed is not at all what really happened. But neither was there anything President Obama or Hillary could have done, so discrepancies in the details do not imply corruptions, incompetence, or malevolence, only a tendency to lie in order to put the best possible spin on every story.

  4. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, 11 months ago

    It is still astounding how the Obamanation, who is FAR more corrupt than Nixon ever dreamed of being, has not been impeached yet. Though maybe not so surprising when you consider the shield of liberals around him and the protection the main stream media affords him.


    INGSOC GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    obama Is even in denial of his denials.. Pretending that all is o.k. when they aren’t due to all of those denials..

  6. TJDestry

    TJDestry GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    What? When did Chip and his pals suddenly start caring about facts?

  7. Gypsy8

    Gypsy8 said, 11 months ago

    What a complete waste of time. No wonder the Chinese and others are moving ahead of the U.S. in so many ways.

  8. coraryan

    coraryan GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago


    No point in impeaching him – could not get it through the Senate. Just wait till next year!

  9. Jim Guess

    Jim Guess said, 11 months ago

    @Doctor Warbucks

    Except, I would have done it this way …

    Nixon = 6
    Bush = 9
    Obama = 23!!

  10. Jim Guess

    Jim Guess said, 11 months ago

    @DrCanuck's Little Sister

    Obviously, you are not related to anyone in the military.
    MILLIONS of Americans care!
    Apparently, it is only the libtards who say, “What difference does it make?”

    The ‘difference’ is this:
    An Ambassador and three other Americans died!

    THAT is the difference! A real POTUS would have done something about it!

    Remember Teddy Roosevelt? “Speak softly and carry a big stick.”

    Hit them hard enough and they will stop attacking us. The problem is this: The current POTUS – read ‘pretender in chief’ – wants to appease, not punish. THAT is the problem!

  11. Jim Guess

    Jim Guess said, 11 months ago


    What movie? Oh, the one that doesn’t exist? The one that was made up by Obummer and Clinton?

    Oh, I get it … that movie …

  12. Ian Rey

    Ian Rey said, 11 months ago

    They have that. It’s called “journalism.” If there were anything to the Fox/Koch machinations, real journalists would have gotten to the bottom of it. People who read real journalists know this is all partisan piffle, file under “Obama Derangement Syndrome.”

  13. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, 11 months ago


    You clearly have never read The US Sentate Intelligence Committee Review if the Terrorist Attacks on Benghazi (1/15/2014), written by the Senate MAJORITY (that would be Democrats) which clearly states:

    FINDING #9: In finished reports after September 11, 2012, intelligence analysts inaccurately referred to the presence of a protest at the Mission facility before the attack based on open source information and limited intelligence, but without sufficent intelligence or eyewitness statements to corroborate that assertion The IC took too long to correct these erroneous report, which caused confusion and influenced the public statements of policymakers. (page 32)

    The IC also had information that there were no protests outside the Temporary Mission Facility prior to the attacks, but did not incorporate that information into its widely circulated assessments in a timely manner. Contrary to many press reports at the time, eyewitness statements by US Personnel indicate there were no protests at the start of the attacks." (page 33)

  14. echoraven

    echoraven said, 11 months ago

    “If you drink the special Kool Aid; all will be fine!”

  15. echoraven

    echoraven said, 11 months ago

    @DrCanuck's Little Sister

    What you mean is that you WANT America to be past the Benghazi thing, after all the left still blames the Shrub for Obama’s biblical incompetence.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).