Chip Bok by Chip Bok

Chip Bok

Comments (31) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    Obama did not say it was a terrorist attack! Two weeks later he was saying it was because of a Movie! it was a so called “moderator” That Lied for him and covered his butt during the debate that said he said it was Terrorism in the Rose garden. What he said in the rose garden was terrorism is bad. But he did not say what happened on 9 11 12 was anything but bad and that he would get those people. And to this day the guy who made the video is in jail. The Doctor who got Bin La din is in Jail. but those that were flying Al Ka da flags as they marched and used military tactics to murder 4, 3 being Navy Seals and 1 being the 1st ambassador since Carter. Are still at large!
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-guantanamo-detainee-implicated-in-benghazi-attack/2014/01/07/c73fdf78-77d5-11e3-8963-b4b654bcc9b2_story.html

  2. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon said, 6 months ago

    Ah yes, the professional troll cites right wing pundits for facts.
    .
    In my opinion, the attack was planned, but the video presented an opportunity to move up the timing of the attack. And by the way, Harley, President Obama did say it was a terrorist attack, but, “Please proceed, governor.”

  3. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    Yeh, Chip, let the lame stream fight out which LIE they want to go with next. Obama’s rewrite of history or the Times.

  4. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    @Zuhlamon but the video presented an opportunity to move up the timing of the attack"

    yeh, that is why it happened on 9 11 12? the same time other riots were going on. Like in Egypt were they were chanting “Obama we are Osama”! This was a coordinated attack on 9 11 !
    And no “President Obama did say it was a terrorist attack,”
    I have a break down of the transcript. He never link the two. It was a bad thing bad bad thing and terrisim is a bad bad thing and we will get those who did this. But two weeks later he was on the talking point that is was “spontaneous” and because of a “YouTube” and that was a bad thing. He was not ready for that 3 am phone call just like Hillary said he would not be. “But what difference does it make now?” He was reelected on that LIE!

  5. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    Obama said the next day the attack was an act of terrorism."
    -
    Let’s put this to rest once and for all.
    Obama NEVER, not once, ever in the Rose Garden speech said, “The Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism.” THAT would be calling the attack an act of terrorism. He never said, “This attack was done by terrorists.”
    .
    I’ll prove he didn’t say it by directly quoting him.
    .
    First he said
    .
    “Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi.”
    .
    Nothing here about terrorists or terrorism, just killed in “an attack”
    .
    “The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack.”
    .
    This time he goes so far as to say it’s an “outrageous” and “shocking” attack, but can’t say “terrorist”
    .
    “…we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people”
    Note how he uses the term “killers” ? Still can’t call them terrorists. And still “attacked"
    .
    “…this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya”
    .
    Still just an “attack” not “terrorist attack”
    .
    But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence
    .
    Now it’s “senseless violence,” not “terrorism”
    .
    “The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.”
    .
    Now they are “brutal acts”
    .
    Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers
    .
    STILL just “attackers” not “terrorists”
    .
    Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks.
    .
    Look! He can’t even call 9/11 an act of terrorism. They were just “attacks.”
    .
    And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.
    .
    After all these words, and still, it’s just an “’attack’ in Benghazi”
    .
    Okay, now I’m going to copy and paste the paragraph where he briefly mentions the word “terror”
    .
    No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.
    .
    Do you see what His Slipperyness has done there?
    He merely said the word “terror” without attaching it to anyone or anything in Benghazi. He just said the word, unattached to any specific act.
    .
    However, he labeled the attacks with ALL sorts of adjectives – senseless, violent, outrageous, shocking, brutal – throughout his entire speech. But not one, ever, even once was one of them “terrorist.” And he called the people who attacked us “killers” and “attackers” but NEVER “terrorists.
    .
    He never, not once, ever directly called Benghazi a terrorist attack done by terrorists. And, just to make sure he didn’t leave us with a false impression, right after saying the word terror, he quickly reverts in the same paragraph to again call it a “terrible act” – he did not and could not and would not link “terrorism” to Benghazi.
    .
    He didn’t even say, “This act of terror” or “The Benghazi act of terror” or even “An act of terror in Benghazi”
    .
    Basically all he said was “an attack was done” and “we won’t tolerate terrorism.”
    .
    BUT, lets hear what he said about the religious video. Early in his speech, before he had his nanosecond of gravitas by merely mentioning the word “terror,” he said this:
    .
    Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.
    .
    See, he makes a reference to the video, which “denigrated the religious beliefs” of Muslims. THIS is what he wants us to believe, at this particular point in time. He thinks he can make this stick because his adoring media will do whatever he wants and all the low information voters will attack Fox for trying to get the truth out.
    .
    After the fact he tried to have it both ways. But words mean things.

    And if you still believe he said it was an act of terror, why did Susan Rice go out on 5 Sunday news shows and say it was a video, AFTER the Rose Garden speech. And why did Jay Carney refuse to answer what it was when asked for many days? And why was Obama out campaigning for a couple weeks, after the Rose Garden speech, saying it was the video?
    .
    Your argument does not hold up.

  6. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 6 months ago

    Nine Congressional investigations into Benghazi. Led by people who would like nothing better than to do harm to this administration. Still waiting for any damning conclusions. No indictments, no arrests, no censures. Unfortunate? Certainly. Criminal? Still awaiting proof.

    Still, you can believe whatever you choose. We still have that freedom. So far.

  7. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    From the Rose Garden “Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers”
    yeh, they did that while they sodomized Stevens dead body as he was carried through the Streets as a trophy!

  8. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    @I Play One On TV

    Nine Congressional investigations into Benghazi."
    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/02/rep-gowdys-explosive-claim-obama-admin-is-changing-names-of-benghazi-survivors-and-dispersing-them-around-the-country-to-keep-them-hidden/

  9. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    @I Play One On TV

    Kind of hard to investigate when you are not allowed to talk to those that were there.

    http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/trey-gowdy-obama-administration-changing-names-creating-aliases-to-hide-benghazi-survivors/

  10. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    http://www.teapartytribune.com/2013/07/01/they-all-lied-about-how-ambassador-christopher-stevens-died-in-benghazi/

  11. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    http://www.direct.cd/2013/09/23/lambassadeur-usa-en-libye-aurait-ete-sodomise-torture-puis-promene-ville-en-trophee-mourir.html?fb_source=pubv1

  12. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, 6 months ago

    The two statements are not mutually exclusive.

  13. lonecat

    lonecat said, 6 months ago

    What is terrorism? I take terrorism to be the attacking of innocent civilians with the intent of creating terror in a civilian population. Does Benghazi count as terror?

  14. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 6 months ago

    @lonecat

    What is terrorism? I take terrorism to be the attacking of innocent civilians with the intent of creating terror in a civilian population. Does Benghazi count as terror?"
    Put it in context, you are running for President. One of your slogans is “Gm alive Bin La din Dead” You state that Al Qua Da is no longer a factor. Then on 9 11 12, on 9 11, the flag of Al Qu Da is flying over many cities as riots break out. You are in bed. The next day you read a statement after being briefed. But for weeks afterwards you have people parroting an cover Lie. Of course you are going to be a little vague, but the lie is there and it is giving you cover. Then in a debate a so called moderate lies for you. Good thing right? But really, if he had said we were attacked and it is an act of terrorism. There would be no need for the Lie or the cover story of "YouTube’ or “Spontaneous” In fact I would even taken, well that is what we thought that day, we were leaving, so we covered our butts by being vague. But NO two weeks later Obama was still parroting the talking point LIE. So either he thinks two weeks later it was only this small thing about YouTube or a terrorism attack. You can not have both.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 6 months ago

    @Harleyquinn

    Thank you for the references. If I posted references from MSNBC or the New York Times, you would be noting that they are unacceptable, as they are likely biased. How does this differ from you sending me links to “teapartytribune.com"?

    But, to be fair, Sen. Issa, for example, has these sites at his disposal, as well; maybe they’re even bookmarked. Yet, what has his committee concluded? Who in the Obama administration is being held responsible? If the info you refer to is true, why is there no action? Perhaps because the story is being exaggerated just a wee bit by the sources you cite?

    Do you think either of us will ever know the truth? If you do, you’re way more optimistic than I. But I still hold to the idea that, if even Mr. Obama’s sworn enemies can’t find a smoking gun, perhaps there isn’t one.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (16).