Chip Bok by Chip Bok

Chip Bok

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, about 3 years ago

    Funny, women have the same reaction to many Republican men.

  2. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, about 3 years ago

    The lawsuits need to start, and I’m usually anti-lawsuit. The government has NO legal right to force people to buy health insurance and dictate what they must and must not cover. So much of what the Obamanation does is just flat illegal and Constitution-trampling.

  3. echoraven

    echoraven said, about 3 years ago


    Women say Republican men make them buy things they don’t need? Huh?


    BIGCHRONO said, about 3 years ago


    I totally agree, & also resent the penalties for not being enrolled, either by choice or inability.

  5. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    Exotic: then tell those Republicans in Congress to stop practicing medicine with women’s bodies, and interfering with medical practices! Take on those state legislators as well that demand women do what those MEN want them to do with their bodies!

    Interesting analogy to the fish, as the male comes along after the female lays her eggs, empties his load, then moves on to disappear, just like so many “pro-life” males trying to dictate laws to make women bring to term, and raise their sperm.

  6. phdtogo

    phdtogo said, about 3 years ago


    You are assuming that you have rights?

  7. paytonb

    paytonb said, about 3 years ago


    Aside from the obvious fact that it’s not only men who are against abortion, nobody is telling women what they can do with “their” bodies. People against abortion believe life begins at conception. i.e. anything aborted after conception is in fact killing a life. If that is proven true, and it is a life as believed, can you honestly believe it’s your right to murder a life you created just because its your body? People make this about rights when it really all boils down to who is right about when life begins.

  8. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, about 3 years ago


    A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

  9. paytonb

    paytonb said, about 3 years ago

    “Tell me, paytonb; what to your mind would qualify as “proof” of that statement? How could that be proven?”

    That’s pretty much the crux of the problem/debate isn’t it? How do we determine anything in society? It will happen when there if/when there is an overwhelming consensus one way or the other. The likely outcome is it will go on without that consensus for a very very long time if not for ever and it will be a hot topic for that entire time. My point was that it boils down to a difference in beliefs, not a difference in intellect or moral compass. There is no need to treat either side of the argument with a belligerent or holier than though attitude. This is not directed at you of course, just explaining my stance you were responding to.

  10. paytonb

    paytonb said, about 3 years ago

    Generally speaking yes. People can get hung up on that word however. Often in our history society, science has felt things to be proven only to have some new finding reveal the proof to be wrong. That being said, yes, in the most basic definition of the word proof..
    1. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
    shows us that to prove something ultimately means no more than compelling the mind to have no doubt that the assertion is in fact true.

  11. paytonb

    paytonb said, about 3 years ago

    Not at all. If the science community does not accept that propaganda than clearly a common consent will never be reached.

  12. hostitulator

    hostitulator said, almost 3 years ago

    How can you possibly fine a starving unemployed broke homeless man .. (Haven For Hope San Antonio Tx)

  13. Refresh Comments.