Chip Bok by Chip Bok

Chip Bok

Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, about 1 year ago

    Funny, women have the same reaction to many Republican men.

  2. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, about 1 year ago

    The lawsuits need to start, and I’m usually anti-lawsuit. The government has NO legal right to force people to buy health insurance and dictate what they must and must not cover. So much of what the Obamanation does is just flat illegal and Constitution-trampling.

  3. echoraven

    echoraven said, about 1 year ago

    @ossiningaling

    Women say Republican men make them buy things they don’t need? Huh?

  4. BIGCHRONO

    BIGCHRONO said, about 1 year ago

    @exoticdoc2

    I totally agree, & also resent the penalties for not being enrolled, either by choice or inability.

  5. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Exotic: then tell those Republicans in Congress to stop practicing medicine with women’s bodies, and interfering with medical practices! Take on those state legislators as well that demand women do what those MEN want them to do with their bodies!


    Interesting analogy to the fish, as the male comes along after the female lays her eggs, empties his load, then moves on to disappear, just like so many “pro-life” males trying to dictate laws to make women bring to term, and raise their sperm.

  6. phdtogo

    phdtogo said, about 1 year ago

    @exoticdoc2

    You are assuming that you have rights?

  7. paytonb

    paytonb said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    Aside from the obvious fact that it’s not only men who are against abortion, nobody is telling women what they can do with “their” bodies. People against abortion believe life begins at conception. i.e. anything aborted after conception is in fact killing a life. If that is proven true, and it is a life as believed, can you honestly believe it’s your right to murder a life you created just because its your body? People make this about rights when it really all boils down to who is right about when life begins.

  8. drybones

    drybones GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    The government! That would be the same oppressive government that makes you wear a seat belt and that funded the development of the polio vaccine and whose scientists refused to let your pregnant mom have Thalidomide in 1960. Abolish the government!

  9. drybones

    drybones GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @paytonb

    “…believe that life begins at conception.” That’s a religious dogma, not an established truth. The obvious solution is already in place: no woman who is opposed to abortion shall be forced to have an abortion, and no woman who is medically qualified to have an abortion shall be denied an abortion if she wants one.

  10. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, about 1 year ago

    @echoraven

    A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

  11. coraryan

    coraryan GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @ossiningaling

    Really? I wouldn’t have anything to do with a Democrat man.

  12. coraryan

    coraryan GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @paytonb

    And the women who have abortions will find out if they were right or wrong when they face God.

  13. drybones

    drybones GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Tigger

    Learn how to use “albeit.” Learn how to draw a proper analogy. The government isn’t requiring dead persons to buy health insurance. I am strongly in favor of mandatory auto insurance, as it protects motorists and non motorists alike, just as health insurance protects the insured and also protects other taxpayers from the high cost of emergency-room treatment for the uninsured. Universal health care also gives people healthier, happier lives, and that makes it a moral imperative.

  14. paytonb

    paytonb said, about 1 year ago

    @DrCanuck

    “Tell me, paytonb; what to your mind would qualify as “proof” of that statement? How could that be proven?”

    That’s pretty much the crux of the problem/debate isn’t it? How do we determine anything in society? It will happen when there if/when there is an overwhelming consensus one way or the other. The likely outcome is it will go on without that consensus for a very very long time if not for ever and it will be a hot topic for that entire time. My point was that it boils down to a difference in beliefs, not a difference in intellect or moral compass. There is no need to treat either side of the argument with a belligerent or holier than though attitude. This is not directed at you of course, just explaining my stance you were responding to.

  15. paytonb

    paytonb said, about 1 year ago

    @DrCanuck

    Generally speaking yes. People can get hung up on that word however. Often in our history society, science has felt things to be proven only to have some new finding reveal the proof to be wrong. That being said, yes, in the most basic definition of the word proof..
    1. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
    shows us that to prove something ultimately means no more than compelling the mind to have no doubt that the assertion is in fact true.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).