Chan Lowe by Chan Lowe

Chan Lowe

Comments (6) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    And who overrides an ambassador who says he doesn’t want more security?

  2. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    And still… BENGHAZI!!! umm, Benghazi? Anyone?

  3. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    It just reiterates what’s been known all along, the right wingers attacks are pure B.S., some mistakes were made, like by Stevens himself, and if the Ambassador had followed the advice of the Libyans and not left Tripoli or non-defensible HOUSE in volatile Benghazi, it wouldn’t have happened: and no coverup occurred. (btw the next day Obama DID SAY “terrorism” was involved, but deaf ears on elephants are standard operating position.

  4. saywhatwhat

    saywhatwhat said, 10 months ago

    @Tigger

    The NY Times had a good report on what happened. Here is a link but the thing is probably longer than your attention span. We can never know all the details. The only thing that is certain is that Republicans will cling to anything they think will make Obama look bad.
    http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/#/?chapt=0

  5. ARodney

    ARodney said, 10 months ago

    @Tigger

    Tigger, the three points you tried to make are right-wing stories that have been debunked by both the NYT and the senate report. No assets were in the area. Please don’t contribute to the problem by repeating falsehoods.

  6. ARodney

    ARodney said, 10 months ago

    @Tigger

    …and the NYT analysis and the senate report confirm that the anti-Islamic film was what started the protests, as they did in 30 other cities. So Obama and Susan Rice told the truth.

  7. Refresh Comments.