Candorville by Darrin Bell

Candorville

Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. PianoGuy24

    PianoGuy24 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Soooooo……That makes it ok for Obama now…..because OTHER presidents did it too…??? Wow…..

  2. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, over 1 year ago

    Well, apparently noone complained in the same manner about those presidents (with possible exception of during the vietnam war).

  3. uh-oh

    uh-oh GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Taking away swat teams jobs!

  4. Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist said, over 1 year ago

    That’s actually an argument Obama religionists use routinely about their god – that he’s not actively engaged in invading innocent nations.

    Of course, he merely drones innocent people and arms, trains and abets murderous terrorist groups which kill innocent people.

    But Obama religionists couldn’t care less about that.

  5. neatslob

    neatslob said, over 1 year ago

    Nobody is claiming Obama is a god. The idiocy of some people is amazing.

  6. Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist said, over 1 year ago

    @neatslob

    There is absolutely no difference between the instinctive defence Obama worshippers make of the Nobel Peace Prizident and a de facto fundamentalist religion. None whatever. I have found Christian fundamentalists defending accounts of Old Testament massacres couched in exactly the same terms as Obama religionists defending his droning of innocent Afghan kids. I have come across Obama religionists claiming he “EARNED” (block letters as in the original) his Nobel Peace Prize. Look in a mirrir if you’re an Obama supporter, and ask yourself why.

  7. Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist said, over 1 year ago

    *mirror.

  8. Griff

    Griff GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    It’s been going on for decades, if not hundreds of years, get real.

  9. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, over 1 year ago

    And religion has nothing to do with it. Some people can’t face the idea that something might be superior to them.

  10. Ray Thomas

    Ray Thomas said, over 1 year ago

    There’s a difference between using them on ENEMIES in a war zone and even SUGGESTING using them on American citizens. And that Obamaite FOOL that suggested this is racism is the “troll” here.

  11. Olongapojoe

    Olongapojoe GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Just read all the comments and the big thing I am amazed by is the Pro-Obama people are actually defending the Presidents use of drones and his use of them on American citizens. Another thing that amazed me was the reluctance of the administration to say that they would not use drones on Americans in the USA. God help us from the media if Bush had done what the Democrats are doing now.

  12. msowards

    msowards said, over 1 year ago

    @Olongapojoe

    It’s not surprising to me how anti-Obama reds are now suddenly so worried about the president going after sworn enemies to the US. If the currently sitting president was a Red too, let’s say a Bush or Romney, there’d be no complaint from them.

  13. tedsini

    tedsini said, over 1 year ago

    I think the administration just wants to keep its options open in dealing with terrorists. Here’s a scenario. A group of terrorists destroy a major target in the U.S. causing a considerable loss of life. The feds track them to a compound in an isolated rural area. The terrorists are well-armed and keep a tight perimeter. The feds estimate it would cost the lives of between 5 and 20 agents to storm the compound. Oh, and one of the terrorists is an American citizen. Do you use a drone in this situation? In my opinion, you never take you options off the table. It alerts potential enemies of our limits and our intentions.

  14. QuietStorm27

    QuietStorm27 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    I’m guessing that those complaining about Obama’s methods agree with all of Bush’s decisions.

  15. CFinFL

    CFinFL said, over 1 year ago

    @sowards—-It is not the going after sworn enemies or the methods used. It is the hypocrisy they object to. The “Reds” are simply pointing out the total sheer hypocrisy of the Democrats, when they scream bloody murder about something the Republicans do, but find it totally OK when they do exactly the same thing or something similar.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (3).