Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson
 March 09, 2011
 From Beginning
 Previous feature

 Next feature
 Current
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this, plus any other comic strip delivered daily to your personalized My Comics Page (homepage and free mobile app).
Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (only $11.88/yr) and have all of your favorite comics emailed to you daily! You'll also get unlimited archive access to decades of comics and an adfree website and mobile app experience.
Custom Comic Home Page
Create a collection of your favorite strips.
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
Account/preferences access on the
GoComics mobile/tablet app.
Follow @calvinandhobbes 
One of the most famous and popular comic strips of all time, Bill Watterson's Calvin and Hobbes has been a timeless worldwide favorite since its introduction in 1985. The beloved comic follows the richly imaginative adventures of 6yearold Calvin and his trusty tiger, Hobbes. Whether you enjoyed it as a child while expanding your vocabulary, as an adult in the newspaper or if you are reacquainting yourself with these cultural icons, Calvin and Hobbes will continue to astound and delight you.
Follow the official Calvin and Hobbes accounts on Facebook and Twitter to hear about publishing news, events and giveaways involving a boy, his pet tiger and their brilliant creator.
© Universal Uclick  All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2016. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions  Privacy Policy
Comments (91) (Please sign in to comment)
chamin said, over 5 years ago
Math atheist > Matheist Long live atheists and matheists~!
♥Mrs. Ladywolf♥ said, over 5 years ago
Wait! So all this time we were forced to learn math against our will.
LX013 said, over 5 years ago
Atheist  Matheist  Theist  Deist.
GROG! said, over 5 years ago
I don’t think so, Calvin. Unlike Religion, the answers to math questions can be proven.
Good morning. Marg, Mike & ♠Lonewolf♠!
chovil said, over 5 years ago
For Pythagorus in ancient Greece, mathematics was a religion. Why does the square of the two sides of a right angle triangle equal the square of the hypotenuse? No reason that I have ever been able to find. That’s the magic of the religion. Why does E=m times c squared? With math you can find this magic, but you can’t explain why or even how the magic works.
Nabuquduriuzhur said, over 5 years ago
It’s more like learning a new language. It has it’s own rules, grammar and so on.
In fact, it’s like a “dead language” in that it has rigid rules. No slang, no colloquialisms. In refreshing for an exam where I hadn’t had to deal with calc in years, a book recommended by a calculus website and published almost exactly 100 years ago turned out to be far better than any of the calc books I’d had to suffer through when I was taking it.
Math can be extended into religion, or rather things that cannot be vindicated in the physics world can be expressed mathematically. String theory is an example. A single dimensional “object” can be expressed as a vector, but the moment such a singularity came into existance in a 4d universe, it would assume a spherical “shape.” Cosmology’s the same way: when you have an act of “spontaneous” creation of something from nothing, that is religion. It can be expressed mathmatically. Well, sort of, but from a physics perspective, it’s junk.
About ten years ago, there were intense arguments about the “Plank era” or 10 to the 42 seconds after the big bang. Again, pure mathematics. There’s simply no way to know what things were like without directly observing it or being able to observe after the fact. What little we can observe of the current universe have changed our theories radically since then, at any rate. And will again. Probably many times in the future.
To give an idea in simple terms of how that kind of thing changes, when I graduated from OIT, there were estimated to be 100 billion stars in the Milky Way. As of two years ago, there were estimated to be 400 billion. A recent development in being able to detect red dwarf stars now stands to triple that number to 1.2 trillion.
Yukoner said, over 5 years ago
Calvin, don’t you want to be a mathemagician?
titanicus said, over 5 years ago
@Grog:
There’s quite a famous example of the ubiquitous nature of maths (in this case, arithmetic) that goes like this:
Prove that 2+1=3.
I’ll leave that to you :)
One thing that always bugs me about any knowledge is that it is all made up by humans to try and explain things. Maths isn’t the truth, it’s just a concept that has been developed over time, by many people, to try and help us along.
E=mc2 only because Einstein says it does. For instance, if someone else defines the parameters differently, then Q=FG/6x, if you want it to. Not quite as catchy, though.
pbarnrob said, over 5 years ago
I recall that geometry has some lemmas that you have to start with, that you just have to take ‘on faith’ as it were. Always bothered me.
That’s why a DIlemma is so bothersome; you’re trying to believe two contradictory things at the same time! Mindbending!
But then there’s the marvel of the Golden Ratio, of 1.618… that the ancients thought was the perfect proportion for a painting. And a basis for Archimedes’ Spiral, the shape of the Chambered Nautilus, who moved into a larger space as he outgrew his old quarters.
It’s related directly to the Fibonnacci series of 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, (the next one is the sum of the last two). somewhere about thirty, the ratio of the two becomes – you guessed it!
And the wonderful Penrose tiles (thanks, Roger!), kites and darts from a fivepointed star, that you can ‘tile the plane’ with but it doesn’t repeat; just recently learned, the ratios of the sides of those is – yup!
(I want to make some for a patio; anybody know a mold?)
Lots of magic in our Universe; ain’t it Grand?
Dberrymanal1 said, over 5 years ago
Good point! Let the pinheads who are always screaming about seperation of church and state put THAT in their pipes and smoke it.
Tineli said, over 5 years ago
I’m just reading “The Math Gene. How Mathematical Thinking Evolved and Why Numbers Are Like Gossip” by Keith Devlin  an in a way he says the same as Calvin does!
zeeny said, over 5 years ago
And I thought I was the only one being forced to learn maths :(
dataweaver said, over 5 years ago
My personal favorite is the “proof” that 1 = 1. It’s obviously a flawed proof; but I have yet to see anyone give a satisfying explanation as to why it’s flawed.
There’s more truth to Calvin’s theory than most people would care to admit.
GrimmaTheNome said, over 5 years ago
On the other hand, since the extent of Calvin’s ‘math’ at this point isn’t anything beyond simple arithmetic it could just be that he’s being an awkward lazy little smartarse. Someone should give him an abacus if he needs constant evidence that 2+3=5.
Johanan Rakkav said, over 5 years ago
I suspect that any such false equation as 1 = 1 involves dividing by zero, which is rightly forbidden. If memory serves Wikipedia devotes a page to the issue and there are undoubtedly other references on the Web and in hard copy that do.
Folks, like it or not all human thinking has to proceed from axioms (things that are accepted “on faith”)  otherwise we couldn’t think at all. There is no such thing as metaphysical neutrality and only overemphasis on some human cognitive processes at the expense of others keeps some people from seeing this.