Comments (15) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   cjr53 said, about 1 month ago

   Yeah, you must be careful. The sharks won’t even help their own.

2. 

   believecommonsense said, about 1 month ago

   New Rule: No lobbyist for medical/pharma/insurance industry is allowed to be covered under any U.S.-based health insurer. They’re already taking too much from the GNP as it is.

3. 

   Obamascares said, about 1 month ago

   I would love government health care.
   I want the one my Senator gets.

4. 

   cdward said, about 1 month ago

   sharks often eat their own young, let alone a wounded shark. And yes, I think it would be good and right if we all had about the same health care delivery system.

5. 

   charlie555 said, about 1 month ago

   Again, where are we going to find the doctors and hospitals to give “43 million” more citizens preventative care. Look at the chaos already occurring at VA hospitals since the influx of patients from the wars.

6. 

   NeoconMan said, about 1 month ago

   charlie555, you have that right. Insuring all those Americans would result in utter chaos. I agree with you; let them die in the streets in an orderly fashion.

7. 

   fennec said, about 1 month ago

   Yes, but, Neo, where are we gonna get all the coroners, morgue workers and so on to handle them? Problems, problems, problems!

8. 

   4uk4ata said, about 1 month ago

   As the Albanians said when they were told their government wanted to declare war on China, “how are we going to bury that many people?”

9. 

   deadheadzan said, about 1 month ago

   “Soylent Green—It’s PEOPLE!!! That’s one thing we could do with the dying masses. Are there stocks for that, Conman?!

10. 

    NeoconMan said, about 1 month ago

    Why do you think the cost of funerals has doubled, tripled, and quadrupled over the last decade?

    As have hospital costs for delivering babies. We got you coming and going.

11. 

    deadheadzan said, about 1 month ago

    But making Soylent Green out of them would be even more cost effective and think of the nutritional value!

12. 

    NeoconMan said, about 1 month ago

    There might be a buck to be made there. If only for agricultural fertilizer.

13. 

    scottfreitas said, about 1 month ago

    Suffering sometimes produces compassion for other sufferers, yes.

    Just not always.

    Depends how hard their hearts are… or how soft their brains, depending on the issues at stake.

14. 

    cdward said, 29 days ago

    ^So perhaps we should all fall into suffering, and then compassion would be greater (for the most part). I’m sure NeoconMan would be 100% behind that effort.

15. 

    NeoconMan said, 29 days ago

    Ha! If you want to suffer, you just go right ahead. Compassion is for wussies. I suffered enough making my first billion and no one helped ME. And now I’m suffering again as this president and liberal congress is limiting my bonus money. Don’t look to me to get all bleary-eyed over YOUR problems.