Comments (9) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   TheGreatSatan said, about 1 year ago

   So are Obama’s and he’s running for President!

2. 

   Sparkadelic said, about 1 year ago

   Fortunately, the American people see through the charade of your talking point, Satan.

3. 

   DndrMffln0808 said, about 1 year ago

   HA!! Great jab TGS. You are absolutely right about that. I think Obama spent more time on Oprah’s couch than he has working as a Senator.

4. 

   HUMPHRIES said, about 1 year ago

   TGS sets the standards … ;oD

5. 

   TheGreatSatan said, about 1 year ago

   Oh so I suppose the inexperienced issue only holds water when it’s against the opposition right? Hypocrisy!

6. 

   charliekane said, about 1 year ago

   TGS & Dndr:

   Not so much the experience as the qualifications. SP is a gimmick. She does not inspire confidence outside the GOP base.

   Of course the following comment came from the evil liberal press, but nonetheless summed up the VP debate for most folks:

   “Biden seemed presidential; Palin seemed mayoral.” ‘Nuff said on that.

   Why did McC forfeit the experience issue by picking Sarah?

7. 

   motivemagus said, about 1 year ago

   TGS, I notice also you keep using a Palin (among other politicians) technique – switch the question to one you want to answer!
   Is Sarah Palin qualified or not? Neither Obama nor Palin nor McCain nor Biden have any experience as President, do they? “Executive experience” for a state with around 700,000 people propped up by oil money is a highly debatable point – especially with only 18 months experience in that. Her experience as Wasilla Mayor is perhaps more pertinent, and she required a City Manager to help manage that! I assess executives for a living, incidentally, and I’d love to give her a real interview on what she specifically did (known as the behavioral interview) and see how she turns out. If we did that with all the candidates, we might get a sense of what their capabilities are instead of debating meaningless experience. Bush has been in office for nearly eight years, and his experience doesn’t seem to be helping. It’s capabilities (aka competencies) and experience that counts. So far, I’m not seeing it in Sarah Palin, and that is her theoretical main advantage over the other three.

8. 

   TheGreatSatan said, about 1 year ago

   “TGS, I notice also you keep using a Palin (among other politicians) technique – switch the question to one you want to answer!”

   No one asked me a question!

   “Is Sarah Palin qualified or not?”

   I’ll just stop you right there actually. Before Palin came on to the scene people were constantly questioning Obama’s experience and the left’s reply to this was something along the lines of “We need an outsider anyway! Who cares if he doesn’t have traditional experience?” But now that you can ask the same question about Palin it suddenly is the most important topic in the world! It’s such hypocrisy.

9. 

   Alexus_The_Great said, about 1 year ago

   Sooo true! only few winks and doggones!

   That’s all!

   There is no substance whatsoever!