Brian McFadden by Brian McFadden

Brian McFadden

Comments (14) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Ginsburg doesn’t see it that way and finds the 1993 Religious Freedoms Restoration Act to be unconstitutional, based on equality under the law not being suitable for application to people she doesn’t like.
    Go figure!
    I guess that is why there are nine Nazgul, so their human idiocy averages out to an acceptable level by internal cancellation. But then so does their intelligence, arriving at a safe, bland mediocrity.

  2. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @BrassOrchid

    I guess that means the constitutional amendment banning slavery is at odds with my constitutional right to follow the religions that clearly states its followers may buy and sell slaves as well as beat them savagely.

  3. vwdualnomand

    vwdualnomand said, over 2 years ago

    people do know condoms and birth control pills are 2 different things. condoms are sold over the counter and pills are prescribed. also, lawyers are not doctors. many of them don’t know enough about anatomy to make a learned statement of the human body.

  4. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 2 years ago

    It turns out that contraceptives are a modern part of health care for women. It’s not just for sluts. I’m sure that the women of America appreciate the useful lessons they are getting on what their health care requirements are from conservative men as much as they always appreciate such advice. Keep at it. We could use more women voting this November.

  5. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 2 years ago

    (P.S. I love “Ruth Banksy Ginsburg.” Good cartoon.)

  6. zekedog55

    zekedog55 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Mormon? Methodist?

  7. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 2 years ago

    ^^ You get one more try.
    I think you can do it.

  8. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Jase99

    “I guess that means … banning slavery is at odds with … religions that clearly states … buy and sell slaves … beat them savagely.”

    Yes. It does indeed. However, in that case the individuals, or slaves as you would have them, have a superior right to liberty, which cannot be put aside by your religion.
    In this case, as an example, the women who demand that the work and persons of others be owned by them for the sake of affording them abortifacients is superseded by the rights of the unwilling benefactors to not be thus owned.
    So, it is not a question of whose rights are superior, but what rights are superior. The question of taxation and slavery is also a good question that should soon be examined. Is it proper for a slave to be considered as 1/3 of an actual person under the law? Some insist that slavery should be on a sliding scale, such that if your income is greater, then your enslavement should also be increased.
    Attempting to codify law is always a delicate business, fraught with contradictions and conflicts. It is fortunate that we have people willing to speak up for even the most odd or weaselly points to contribute a counterpoint to your own sage advice, so we may achieve a state of harmonic balance.

  9. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @ARodney

    You should see the “Wrath Hover Ginsbot” on an episode of Cartoon Network’s Clarence. Very funny. Good stuff. Do a web search for it.

  10. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    I don’t mean to contradict, but aren’t these laws only applicable to “on demand” abortions, with medically necessary procedures unaffected? It would be a shame it if were otherwise.
    Would you happen to know?

  11. nate9279

    nate9279 said, over 2 years ago

    Please do explaaaain it! HOYVIN-GLAVIN!

  12. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Yeah. He should probably be replaced before he causes a major breakdown of the system. That clunking sound he makes is disturbing.

  13. Donald Ostrem

    Donald Ostrem said, over 2 years ago

    Hey Brian, would you create this cartoon if the SCOTUS decided in this case if was run by Moslem? Apparently not, since you are afraid of them. But hey, Harry Reid is going to try to get a bill that will force HOBBY LOBBY and other Christian companies to be FORCED for these sex toys and abortions. I don’t want to be forced to buy something that I don’t believe in and what’s wrong. But hey, you’re libs, you don’t care as long as it’s for your agenda. One more thing, I strongly believe if conservatives run this country is going to be like living as a puritan or relegious you hate so much. I can’t turn back the clock.

  14. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Donald Ostrem

    You are missing the whole point of the Hobby Lobby ruling, though. It is a product of the ACA, which is meant to illustrate the horrible state of health care as it exists today without the Great Boon of socialized medicine and the single payer system.
    It doesn’t matter on which side of the debate you sit, as long as you get the message that an employer has no business in your health care and it should be managed by a governmental agency that will act more fairly, efficiently and appropriately than any private business could.
    (according to the brochures…)

  15. Refresh Comments.