Brewster Rockit by Tim Rickard

Brewster Rockit

Comments (34) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, about 2 years ago

    1 Samuel 13:19-21:

    19 Now no blacksmith could be found in all the land of Israel, for the Philistines said, “Otherwise the Hebrews will make [a]swords or spears.” 20 So all Israel went down to the Philistines, each to sharpen his plowshare, his mattock, his axe, and his hoe. 21 The charge was [b]two-thirds of a shekel for the plowshares, the mattocks, the forks, and the axes, and to fix the hoes.

  2. margueritem

    margueritem GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    No big surprise there, guys.

  3. Altair1371

    Altair1371 said, about 2 years ago

    This is something I feel the government never understands. If somebody wants to kill someone, they’ll beat them senseless with a stick if they have to.

  4. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, about 2 years ago

    @Altair1371

    Tough to go on a mass murder spree with a stick … easy with an automatic weapon.

  5. fullmoondeb

    fullmoondeb said, about 2 years ago

    Amen, Bruno!

  6. Phatts California

    Phatts California said, about 2 years ago

    @Bruno Zeigerts

    … and hard to stop a murder spree without one also …

    or did you imagine we could legislate automatic weapons into non-existence?

  7. Brandon

    Brandon said, about 2 years ago

    I don’t drink. I see all the misery caused by alcoholism- abused spouses and children, innocents killed by drunk drivers, people losing their jobs because of alcoholism, children drinking the alcohol they sneak from adults who purchased it legally, etc.

    So, following the logic of the gun control lefties, we need to crack down on alcohol problems, we need to track everyone who purchases alcohol, ban many people from purchasing it based on their being at risk of any problems, etc.

    Funny thing how the hypocritical, dishonest, perverted lefties are always quick to stomp on our Constitutional rights when they don’t like those rights, but can turn right around and justify anything they like.

  8. Randy_B

    Randy_B GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    It’s really tiring to beat someone to death with a plowshare.
    Fatality comes much more quickly with a sword.

  9. Varnes

    Varnes said, about 2 years ago

    Hey, did ya hear the one about the plow that wouldn’t share? I didn’t think so….

  10. Gary McSpook

    Gary McSpook said, about 2 years ago

    @Brandon

    “Funny thing how the hypocritical, dishonest, perverted lefties are always quick to stomp on our Constitutional rights when they don’t like those rights, but can turn right around and justify anything they like.”
    Wow, there’s a big ol’ mouthful of self-serving, hypocritical b.s. for you.
    Just so we’re clear on this, you are aware that the 2nd Amendment only covers possession of weapons for “well-regulated militias,” right? Tell me which militia you’re in, and then we’ll discuss your “right” to own a high-powered semi-automatic rifle with a thirty round clip meant only to kill other humans.
    If you can’t feel secure enough with a pistol or a shotgun, you may too paranoid to be allowed to own weapons.

  11. pcolli

    pcolli said, about 2 years ago

    @Gary McSpook

    When politicians set us a good example, we’ll think about following it. Until then we’ll be just as corrupt as they are.

  12. Cat Hammer

    Cat Hammer said, about 2 years ago

    @ Gary McSpook
    You said: "Just so we’re clear on this, you are aware that the 2nd Amendment only covers possession of weapons for “well-regulated militias,” right? "

    Before you “correct” someone, it might be a good idea to make sure you’re not absolutely wrong….as in your opinion being refuted by the Supreme Court, and historical evidence.

    “Well regulated” refers to the idea that the militias should be in good working order (like a clock)…properly trained and equipped. The acknowledgement of the peoples’ right to arms is the actual (existing, not government granted) right enumerated in the amendment, and the “militia” part is an instruction to the states to take advantage of this in organizing their militias. This intent is more easily seen (by us, today) in the format of some of the suggested versions of the amendment offered at the time by some of the states (including New York). There, the phrasing is reversed and the individual right stated first.

    This also implied that the individual right included access to the same type of arms “common” to an individual soldier, a test the courts have continued to use.

  13. GoodQuestion

    GoodQuestion GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Guess they missed the point, too . . . ☻

  14. pcolli

    pcolli said, about 2 years ago

    I get the impression that Americans never agree about anything.

  15. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, about 2 years ago

    @pcolli

    I’m from Canada … and .. regrettably, it isn’t an exclusively American trait.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (19).