Brewster Rockit by Tim Rickard

Brewster Rockit

Recommended

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. TheQadventures

    TheQadventures said, 5 months ago

    Hey that’s still more than usual.

  2. whitecarabao

    whitecarabao said, 5 months ago

    I guess the bio-meter’s scale doesn’t have negative numbers .

  3. Bilan

    Bilan said, 5 months ago

    The numbers have to right. With Brewster’s low intelligence, he must have a lot of curiosity. After all, nature abhors a vacuum.

  4. Gary McSpook

    Gary McSpook said, 5 months ago

    With 2% Sincerity he should get out of Science and into Politics.
    No, wait, in Politics that much Sincerity would be a liability.
    Perhaps Religion.

  5. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, 5 months ago

    @Gary McSpook

    Or he could be a lawyer … no … still too much sincerity.

  6. win

    win said, 5 months ago

    And the right hand we don’t see has crossed fingers.

  7. Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם)

    Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם) said, 5 months ago

    @Gary McSpook

    “Science” falsely so-called needs a major reality check about how much sincerity it has compared to those it looks down on. On the whole it has no more and no less within its proper domain than does any other human institution. The common thread – human nature – remains the same. It simply expresses itself in different ways.

  8. Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם)

    Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם) said, 5 months ago

    > on the whole, I mean to say, even what is really science in human hands has no more and no less sincerity…

  9. Peabody-Martini

    Peabody-Martini said, 5 months ago

    Too late.

  10. pcolli

    pcolli said, 5 months ago

    @Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם)

    In spite of all the invective I’m going to receive from certain people, I think science requires just as must faith as religion

  11. puddleglum1066

    puddleglum1066 said, 5 months ago

    @pcolli

    Only if you accept as fact (despite our being utterly unable to prove it through observation or experiment) that the universe operates according to consistent laws that work the same across all time and all space.


    Of course, in Science we call that a “postulate”; only in religion is it called “faith.”

  12. algurka

    algurka said, 5 months ago

    @TheQadventures

    I think Dr Mel broke it.

  13. Coyoty

    Coyoty said, 5 months ago

    Dr. Mel can’t go into politics or religion. Who ever heard of evil megalomaniac politicians or clerics?

  14. corzak

    corzak said, 5 months ago

    @Alain Harper, @pcolli, etc:

    Science is a “body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting previous knowledge”.

    It is a method. We use it to test. We let reality speak for itself. We use it to continuously update and correct our knowledge.

    The scientific method is the reason you’re able to read these words, sent from thousands of miles away, on an illuminated tablet.

  15. pcolli

    pcolli said, 5 months ago

    See, I knew loads of people would tell me I was wrong – but I stand by my statement.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).