Bob Gorrell by Bob Gorrell

Bob Gorrell

Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Magnaut

    Magnaut GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    The above ’toon looks like his TelePrompTer

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Truly limited can be smart. Iraq and Afghanistan for all the “wrong reasons”, now THOSE were both “dumb”!

  3. trm

    trm said, over 1 year ago

    From those (including our Bumbler-in-Chief) who thought Vietnam wasn’t in America’s interest: Syria.

  4. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Another brilliant right wing cartoon expressing no point except hatred for Obama.
    -
    Does Gorrell believe there should be no response? An unlimited response? An invasion?
    -
    Gorrell offers nothing but criticism for a decision that has not yet been made, and expresses NO point of view about what the decision should be. He might offer a clue about why he thinks Obama’s policy toward Syria is ‘dumb’ and what should be done instead.

  5. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    His cartoons are limited and dumb.

  6. David Lagesse

    David Lagesse said, over 1 year ago

    Assad is innocent, Barak INSANE Obama wants to start WW III
    http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-news-rebels-admit-gas-attack-result-of-mishandling-chemical-weapons

  7. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    So, now he’s said he’ll go to Congress, and the Republicans will have two weeks to dream up why he’s wrong for doing exactly what they demanded! (per usual!)


    Still find intervention in civil wars a bad thing, not a pacifist, but definitely “anti’ war”, especially stupid ones like Afghanistan and Iraq, and well, Grenada, Panama, getting our troops blown up in Beirut, or of course that “wonder war”, called “Iran Contra” that should have led to impeachment, AND prison sentences!

  8. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Tigger

    ‘Yet you feel there should not have been any response when it was discovered Afghanistan was responsible for The September 11, 2001 Attacks.’
    -
    Actually, I feel we should have not abandoned the pursuit of bin Laden and Al Qaeda in favor of invading Iraq for non-existent reasons.
    -
    Yes, I am blaming The Decider for the invasion of Iraq. Or did the 4000+ American soldiers killed in Iraq come back to life when Bush left the White House?
    -
    Or was all the unfinanced costs of the wars magically returned to the treasury?

  9. Paul Harvey

    Paul Harvey said, over 1 year ago

    @braindead08

    We’re not going. Barry can’t decide where he drew the red line. Nobody else whats to go with us, congress won’t give him their blessing. The problem is both sides are bad, on is Hitler and the other is Stalin. Why is getting killed by gas worse than getting killed by a bullet, or a machete or a bomb. If you kill your own people you are bad, period. Pol Pot killed his own people. Stalin killed his own people. Hitler killed his own people.

  10. Paul Harvey

    Paul Harvey said, over 1 year ago

    @Tigger

    W went to congress, he got Kerry, Clinton, Durbin, and Schumer to vote to go to war. They all believed Sadam had WMD’s because we sold them to him. W had 48 other countries with us, Barry has one weak, maybe from France.

  11. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Paul Harvey

    The invasion of Iraq was NOT sold on Saddam having chemical weapons. Everyone believed he had them, even though it turned out he didn’t.
    -
    The invasion of Iraq was sold on Saddam’s having nucular weapons, which was a lie from beginning to end.
    -
    Curveball was interviewed on 60 minutes and stated that he was fed information by ‘someone’ to make him credible when he said Saddam had nucular weapons.
    -
    And in England, the ‘facts were fixed to fit the policy’.
    -
    And there is still a significant portion of Republicans/Fox “news” viewers who believe Saddam was involved in the 9/11 attacks.

  12. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    BTW, I do share the disgust for the Democrats not applying more scrutiny to the lies of the Bush administration.

  13. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @DrCanuck

    Nah. It’s okay if a Republican does it.

  14. martens misses all her friends

    martens misses all her friends said, over 1 year ago

    How about “If you kill people, you are bad”? Although I would rather say that if you kill people, you have done a bad act, no matter who it was. I’m not really sure in my own mind what constitutes a bad person, as opposed to a person who does a bad act. We ask our military to do what are bad acts, but we cannot say that they are all bad people, in fact in most cases, we can say the opposite with full justice. Moral relativism, anyone?

  15. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    ^You don’t realize how much you care about people, until you’ve killed a bunch of them, personally.


    It is that experience that makes REMF types, and chickenhawks so dismal (disgusting) to those of us who’ve been there, done that.


    Also, when someone IS trying to kill you, killing them is “easier” at the time, but not so much later, when reflection, and memories keep returning. Killing innocent bystanders by accident, like because you didn’t know they were there, is much worse.


    Those who deliberately kill innocent bystanders, with the excuse such as during “shock and awe”, that they are merely “necessary collateral damage”, are devoid of morals, and are psychopathic sociopaths, and motivated by greed, for either money, power, or just “status”. THEY are no longer members of the “human” community, and no matter what flag they wave, are totally evil.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (4).