Bob Gorrell by Bob Gorrell

Bob Gorrell

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, over 3 years ago

    ‘Scuse me. Anger management issues aside, a government is SUPPOSED to make life better for its people. If you think having someone to mow yer lawn and pick yer strawberries dirt cheap ain’t making life better in the Good Ol’ US of A, you ain’t thinking.

  2. neuturn

    neuturn said, over 3 years ago


    Those that are not legal now will in turn expect higher wages once they are given citizenship. It is only common sense, the ACLU and Farm Unions will demand it, therefore it will not be cheaper. They will be entitled to healthcare provided by the farmer. This too will increase the price of product. What are they paying the workers right now? The Government is trying to change minimum wage (around $12.00 per hr), nice try.

  3. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 3 years ago

    Uneducated, unskilled people? Yep, future Democrats.

  4. neuturn

    neuturn said, over 3 years ago

    They may be placing them across the boarders at a higher volume, but they are coming across the boarder at an even higher rate than that. Does that make it better?

  5. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 3 years ago

    Just a reminder: corporate welfare costs money, too; probably more than all the food stamps put together. Democrats aren’t the only people offering “free stuff”. I do not condone either, but I am not willing to ignore one type of government largesse in favor of another just because of who I vote for.

  6. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 3 years ago


    “Those that are not legal now will in turn expect higher wages once they are given citizenship.”

    So, what’s your alternative? Keep them illegal and keep your food bill lower, or let them become legal and pay them like regular people? Or send them all home (good luck) and expect Americans to pick your vegetables at the going rate?

    Americans won’t pick vegetables, cotton, fruit, etc., for the wages now being offered. This means food prices will go up if wages are brought into line with expecteds, or more likely, they’ll go up even more because we’ll have to go above minimum wage to even attract applicants.

    I am not trying to cause discontent. I just see no other alternatives than the ones proposed above, and none of those are really attractive. Do you see something I don’t?

  7. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release said, over 3 years ago

    Love how this guy goes from race baiting in the media to race baiting for Democratic votes.

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Anyone want to review how much of North America Spain, and France, controlled before the British showed up? It’s really funny in a way today to see all the rednecks bent because “Hispanics” want their land back!!!

  9. neuturn

    neuturn said, over 3 years ago

    @I Play One On TV

    I was just trying to point out to those who believe that by doing the amnesty thing is not going to cause a soar in prices. I guess they could close the boarder then raise the wages, force the farmers to hire legal citizens to do the work. As they can replace the undocumented workers then they get an incentive to help defer the cost of searching for the legal citizens. I am not sure how to deter the farmer from hiring the undocumented laborers. The undocumented persons should be forced by farmers to legally apply for citizenship as the rest of those who come through the process properly. There does need to be punishment for those who continue to hire undocumented persons in order to force them to change. I am not saying to send anyone home, but we cannot continue to just let the status quot continue.

  10. Vlad Taltos

    Vlad Taltos said, over 3 years ago

    So wait, are Hispanics a minority to be protected or racist white oppressors today? Zimmerman has gotten me confused on this point lately…

  11. Ron

    Ron GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago


    No… the founding fathers set up a country that allows the individual people in it to make life better for themselves.
    The more involved and centralized the government becomes, the less likely it is that people will be able to do that.

  12. Mike Cronis

    Mike Cronis said, over 3 years ago


  13. Refresh Comments.