Bob Gorrell by Bob Gorrell

Bob Gorrell

Comments (8) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Cynthia

    Cynthia GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago


  2. Ajax 4Hire

    Ajax 4Hire said, almost 4 years ago

    It is not about firearms, it is about protection and…
    The Police are not there to protect you (look up Warren v. District of Columbia).

    The 2nd Amendment is to protect YOU and me from the oppression of government. Today, you may not need a gun but you still need defense from the government.

    How would you feel if I took away your right to a defense….lawyer?

  3. wvmacleod

    wvmacleod said, almost 4 years ago

    Exectly how is your gun protecting you from your government?

  4. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 4 years ago

    And you just shoot off your mount trying to gain more attention child. (just like me..LOL)

    I lOVE the way you cherry pick what someone says (like I am sure you will just focus on my opening statement) and completely direct attention from the point.

    But then Canada is such a wonderland of tolerant government rules and regs……well.

    Point being, the next time you or someone you know is faced with the task of “proving your innocence” in a court of law, Please, fore go a
    defense lawyer and just do it yourself.

    and as you say, " Rotsa Ruck." (which by the way is a racial stereotypical comment that you should be ashamed of using)

  5. echoraven

    echoraven said, almost 4 years ago


  6. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release said, almost 4 years ago

    Nurf! Nurf!

  7. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    I have numerous firearms that could “protect my home”, and NONE OF THEM look or function like the one in the ’toon. I can also take a critter, including the two-legged type, at over 1,000 yards, that you cannot do with the illustrated firearm.

    As Whoopie Goldberg on “The View” knew, my pump action 870, just cranking in a round, will run off any burglar more effectively than the AR with massive magazine/clip.

    I also taught a lady nine ways to take out a potential mugger last week, without a firearm, four lethal if properly done. (btw) nine years ago, she DID shoot an assailant, in the legs, and preferred what I showed her, even though she still DOES have a 32 semi-auto in her pocket.

    Limiting mass-killing weapons with no sensible civilian purpose is a GOOD idea, without taking away “gun rights” to sensible, perfectly functional, AND EFFECTIVE, firearms.

    The simple fact is, the “NRA types” are simply paranoid, and nuts, and the Constitution does NOT see folks defending themselves from their ELECTED government, but invaders, as PART OF THE MiliTIA, period!

  8. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 4 years ago

    hahahahaha, I bet you do…. fat fingers and typing fast mouth mouth mouth ….. type that fast three times

  9. Refresh Comments.