Ben Sargent by Ben Sargent

Ben Sargent

Recommended

Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    They STILL won’t get it right!

  2. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 1 year ago

    Of course, choosing the same guys for the same roles wasn’t can kicking on the voters part.

  3. K M

    K M said, over 1 year ago

    @walruscarver2000

    No, that was insanity, doing the same thing and expecting different results.

  4. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    “We don’t care what the sign says. We don’t need to do our job. And you can’t make us.”

  5. Dredpiraterobt$

    Dredpiraterobt$ said, over 1 year ago

    Maybe just two cans will get kicked!
    .
    How about this, If one get’s kicked, three get kicked!

  6. Ennui_rudy Rutherford

    Ennui_rudy Rutherford said, over 1 year ago

    @onguard

    You’ll believe anything Fox News tells you won’t you? What a tool.

  7. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    He said “free stuff” Drink!

    No need to promise free stuff. Apathy is rampant in this country. We did our job: we voted the bums back in. Now we can trust the bums to do what we want.

  8. Wabbit

    Wabbit GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Politicians don’t l listen to voters. Period.
    That is a clearest fact in politics.

  9. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 1 year ago

    @K M

    Isn’t that kind of like calling a rabbit a bunny?

  10. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 1 year ago

    what i don’t understand is why republicans want to increase taxes ONLY on the middle class.

  11. GreggW

    GreggW GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Too bad that enforcement can only be applied every two years.

  12. Dredpiraterobt$

    Dredpiraterobt$ said, over 1 year ago

    What I think we should do is call for a referendum!
    .
    This project is too important for representational government, it must come down to a straight out majority rule.
    .
    Here is our plan: Tax rates at such and so, Medicare funded by such and such, Social security funded by this and that. Education funding, education standards, maximum class size = X students, new schools will be built and will be paid for by thus and such. Roads, bridges, Health care, Day care, Welfare, PBS, Debt,
    .
    Here is OUR plan: Tax rates, deductions, cuts to social security, cuts to entitlements, cuts to social spending, cuts to R&D spending Debt, deficit
    .
    The Starve The Beast strategy calls for exactly these sorts of choices. I say we call their hand! But we don’t let the puppets in Washington make the decision. Let the people decide.
    .
    When given the choices, without the politics, the majority of Americans agree with policies that got us here today; “One for all and all for one”. As opposed to the ideas that got us to 100 years ago, “All for one and that one is ME!”

  13. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 1 year ago

    @Dredpiraterobt$

    Great theory, but have you looked at the people they have elected to office in recent years. Isn’t that sort of letting the inmates run the asylum?

  14. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, over 1 year ago

    If only this were true! I’m not certain about the rules for recall-elections in regards to Congress, but at least the threat of such should always hang over the shoulders of elected officials. Four years is enough time to get fat, rich and prominent (for later punditry) in Washington, and a lost re-election is no death-knell either, politically, financially and socially. Being kicked out of office by your own constituents on the other hand…

  15. church mouse

    church mouse said, over 1 year ago

    @Ennui_rudy Rutherford

    Amen

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).